Legal insanity and risk: An international perspective on the justification of indeterminate preventive commitment

Johannes Bijlsma, Tijs Kooijmans, Ferry de Jong, G. Meynen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
172 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Modern legal systems typically link the insanity or diminished responsibility of an offender for a crime committed in the past to his future dangerousness. This nexus serves across legal systems as a justification for the indeterminate commitment of the offender with diminished or no criminal responsibility. Conceptually, however, insanity and risk are not related legal issues. Moreover, empirical research suggests that there is only a weak link between insanity, diminished responsibility and mental illness on the one hand and risk of recidivism on the other. Other risk factors seem to be more important. The inference of risk from insanity or diminished responsibility that lies at the heart of the indeterminate commitment of mentally disordered offenders is therefore problematic. This should lead to a reconsideration of the preconditions for indeterminate commitment of mentally disordered defendants.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101462
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Volume66
Issue numberSeptember/October 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Insanity
  • Preventive commitment
  • Risk
  • SCHIZOPHRENIA

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Legal insanity and risk: An international perspective on the justification of indeterminate preventive commitment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this