Liberalising Gambling Markets: Lessons from Network Industries?

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

317 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper, based on my concluding remarks at the “Colloquium on the Economic Aspects of Gambling Regulation: EU and US Perspectives” held at Tilburg in November 2006, discusses the question why, in Europe, some service sectors (such as network industries) are liberalised, while others (like the gambling sector) are not. In both, the discussion appears to be one-sided. In the former, the focus is on consumer benefits, where in the latter, only the possible consumer harm associated with liberalisation is discussed. A proper balancing of costs and benefits can, and should, be subsumed under the ECJ’s proportionality test, as formulated in Gambelli. If this more economic approach is taken, the result might very well be less restrictive policy towards gambling and games of chance.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherTILEC
Number of pages15
Volume2007-025
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Publication series

NameTILEC Discussion Paper
Volume2007-025

Keywords

  • Gambling
  • market liberalisation
  • EU internal market

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Liberalising Gambling Markets: Lessons from Network Industries?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    van Damme, E. E. C. (2007). Liberalising Gambling Markets: Lessons from Network Industries? (TILEC Discussion Paper; Vol. 2007-025). TILEC.