Liberalising Gambling Markets

Lessons from Network Industries?

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

264 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper, based on my concluding remarks at the “Colloquium on the Economic Aspects of Gambling Regulation: EU and US Perspectives” held at Tilburg in November 2006, discusses the question why, in Europe, some service sectors (such as network industries) are liberalised, while others (like the gambling sector) are not. In both, the discussion appears to be one-sided. In the former, the focus is on consumer benefits, where in the latter, only the possible consumer harm associated with liberalisation is discussed. A proper balancing of costs and benefits can, and should, be subsumed under the ECJ’s proportionality test, as formulated in Gambelli. If this more economic approach is taken, the result might very well be less restrictive policy towards gambling and games of chance.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherTILEC
Number of pages15
Volume2007-025
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Publication series

NameTILEC Discussion Paper
Volume2007-025

Fingerprint

Gambling
Network industries
Economics
Proportionality
Costs and benefits
European Court of Justice
Liberalization
Service sector

Keywords

  • Gambling
  • market liberalisation
  • EU internal market

Cite this

van Damme, E. E. C. (2007). Liberalising Gambling Markets: Lessons from Network Industries? (TILEC Discussion Paper; Vol. 2007-025). Tilburg: TILEC.
@techreport{05e5f2b8a1b5463898272e7e38a80802,
title = "Liberalising Gambling Markets: Lessons from Network Industries?",
abstract = "This paper, based on my concluding remarks at the “Colloquium on the Economic Aspects of Gambling Regulation: EU and US Perspectives” held at Tilburg in November 2006, discusses the question why, in Europe, some service sectors (such as network industries) are liberalised, while others (like the gambling sector) are not. In both, the discussion appears to be one-sided. In the former, the focus is on consumer benefits, where in the latter, only the possible consumer harm associated with liberalisation is discussed. A proper balancing of costs and benefits can, and should, be subsumed under the ECJ’s proportionality test, as formulated in Gambelli. If this more economic approach is taken, the result might very well be less restrictive policy towards gambling and games of chance.",
keywords = "Gambling, market liberalisation, EU internal market",
author = "{van Damme}, E.E.C.",
note = "Pagination: 15",
year = "2007",
language = "English",
volume = "2007-025",
series = "TILEC Discussion Paper",
publisher = "TILEC",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "TILEC",

}

van Damme, EEC 2007 'Liberalising Gambling Markets: Lessons from Network Industries?' TILEC Discussion Paper, vol. 2007-025, TILEC, Tilburg.

Liberalising Gambling Markets : Lessons from Network Industries? / van Damme, E.E.C.

Tilburg : TILEC, 2007. (TILEC Discussion Paper; Vol. 2007-025).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - Liberalising Gambling Markets

T2 - Lessons from Network Industries?

AU - van Damme, E.E.C.

N1 - Pagination: 15

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - This paper, based on my concluding remarks at the “Colloquium on the Economic Aspects of Gambling Regulation: EU and US Perspectives” held at Tilburg in November 2006, discusses the question why, in Europe, some service sectors (such as network industries) are liberalised, while others (like the gambling sector) are not. In both, the discussion appears to be one-sided. In the former, the focus is on consumer benefits, where in the latter, only the possible consumer harm associated with liberalisation is discussed. A proper balancing of costs and benefits can, and should, be subsumed under the ECJ’s proportionality test, as formulated in Gambelli. If this more economic approach is taken, the result might very well be less restrictive policy towards gambling and games of chance.

AB - This paper, based on my concluding remarks at the “Colloquium on the Economic Aspects of Gambling Regulation: EU and US Perspectives” held at Tilburg in November 2006, discusses the question why, in Europe, some service sectors (such as network industries) are liberalised, while others (like the gambling sector) are not. In both, the discussion appears to be one-sided. In the former, the focus is on consumer benefits, where in the latter, only the possible consumer harm associated with liberalisation is discussed. A proper balancing of costs and benefits can, and should, be subsumed under the ECJ’s proportionality test, as formulated in Gambelli. If this more economic approach is taken, the result might very well be less restrictive policy towards gambling and games of chance.

KW - Gambling

KW - market liberalisation

KW - EU internal market

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 2007-025

T3 - TILEC Discussion Paper

BT - Liberalising Gambling Markets

PB - TILEC

CY - Tilburg

ER -