### Abstract

Original language | English |
---|---|

Place of Publication | Tilburg |

Publisher | Finance |

Number of pages | 46 |

Volume | 2000-35 |

Publication status | Published - 2000 |

### Publication series

Name | CentER Discussion Paper |
---|---|

Volume | 2000-35 |

### Fingerprint

### Keywords

- Term Structure Models
- Interest Rate Derivatives
- Lognormal Pricing Models
- Black Formula

### Cite this

*Libor and Swap Market Models for the Pricing of Interest Rate Derivatives: An Empirical Analysis*. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2000-35). Tilburg: Finance.

}

**Libor and Swap Market Models for the Pricing of Interest Rate Derivatives : An Empirical Analysis.** / de Jong, F.C.J.M.; Driessen, J.J.A.G.; Pelsser, A.

Research output: Working paper › Discussion paper › Other research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - Libor and Swap Market Models for the Pricing of Interest Rate Derivatives

T2 - An Empirical Analysis

AU - de Jong, F.C.J.M.

AU - Driessen, J.J.A.G.

AU - Pelsser, A.

N1 - Pagination: 46

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - In this paper we empirically analyze and compare the Libor and Swap Market Models, developed by Brace, Gatarek, and Musiela (1997) and Jamshidian (1997), using paneldata on prices of US caplets and swaptions.A Libor Market Model can directly be calibrated to observed prices of caplets, whereas a Swap Market Model is calibrated to a certain set of swaption prices.For both one-factor and two-factor models we analyze how well they price caplets and swaptions that were not used for calibration.We show that the Libor Market Models in general lead to better prediction of derivative prices that were not used for calibration than the Swap Market Models.A one-factor Libor Market Model that exhibits mean-reversion gives a good fit of the derivative prices, and adding a second factor only decreases pricing errors to a small extent.We also find that models that are chosen to exactly match certain derivative prices are overfitted. Finally, a regression analysis reveals that the pricing errors are correlated with the shape of the term structure of interest rates.

AB - In this paper we empirically analyze and compare the Libor and Swap Market Models, developed by Brace, Gatarek, and Musiela (1997) and Jamshidian (1997), using paneldata on prices of US caplets and swaptions.A Libor Market Model can directly be calibrated to observed prices of caplets, whereas a Swap Market Model is calibrated to a certain set of swaption prices.For both one-factor and two-factor models we analyze how well they price caplets and swaptions that were not used for calibration.We show that the Libor Market Models in general lead to better prediction of derivative prices that were not used for calibration than the Swap Market Models.A one-factor Libor Market Model that exhibits mean-reversion gives a good fit of the derivative prices, and adding a second factor only decreases pricing errors to a small extent.We also find that models that are chosen to exactly match certain derivative prices are overfitted. Finally, a regression analysis reveals that the pricing errors are correlated with the shape of the term structure of interest rates.

KW - Term Structure Models

KW - Interest Rate Derivatives

KW - Lognormal Pricing Models

KW - Black Formula

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 2000-35

T3 - CentER Discussion Paper

BT - Libor and Swap Market Models for the Pricing of Interest Rate Derivatives

PB - Finance

CY - Tilburg

ER -