Limited capacity to lie

Cognitive load interferes with being dishonest

Anna E. van 't Veer, Marielle Stel, Ilja van Beest

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The current study tested the boundary conditions of ethical decision-making by increasing cognitive load. This manipulation is believed to hinder deliberation, and, as we argue, reduces the cognitive capacity needed for a self-serving bias to occur. As telling a lie is believed to be more cognitively taxing than telling the truth, we hypothesized that participants would be more honest under high cognitive load than low cognitive load. 173 participants anonymously rolled a die three times and reported their outcomes – of which one of the rolls would be paid out – while either under high or low cognitive load. For the roll that determined pay, participants under low cognitive load, but not under high cognitive load, reported die rolls that were significantly different from a uniform (honest) distribution. The reported outcome of this roll was also significantly higher in the low load condition than in the high load condition, suggesting that participants in the low load condition lied to get higher pay. This pattern was not observed for the second and third roll where participants knew the rolls were not going to be paid out and where therefore lying would not serve self-interest. Results thus indicate that having limited cognitive capacity will unveil a tendency to be honest in a situation where having more cognitive capacity would have enabled one to serve self-interest by lying.
Keywords: Deception, Cognitive Processing Capacity, Dual System, Ethical Decision-making
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)199-206
JournalJudgment and Decision Making
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2014

Keywords

  • deception
  • cognitive processing capacity
  • morality
  • dual system
  • decision-making

Cite this

van 't Veer, Anna E. ; Stel, Marielle ; van Beest, Ilja. / Limited capacity to lie : Cognitive load interferes with being dishonest. In: Judgment and Decision Making. 2014 ; Vol. 9, No. 3. pp. 199-206.
@article{5feeaea49614446ea239586e57a686c8,
title = "Limited capacity to lie: Cognitive load interferes with being dishonest",
abstract = "The current study tested the boundary conditions of ethical decision-making by increasing cognitive load. This manipulation is believed to hinder deliberation, and, as we argue, reduces the cognitive capacity needed for a self-serving bias to occur. As telling a lie is believed to be more cognitively taxing than telling the truth, we hypothesized that participants would be more honest under high cognitive load than low cognitive load. 173 participants anonymously rolled a die three times and reported their outcomes – of which one of the rolls would be paid out – while either under high or low cognitive load. For the roll that determined pay, participants under low cognitive load, but not under high cognitive load, reported die rolls that were significantly different from a uniform (honest) distribution. The reported outcome of this roll was also significantly higher in the low load condition than in the high load condition, suggesting that participants in the low load condition lied to get higher pay. This pattern was not observed for the second and third roll where participants knew the rolls were not going to be paid out and where therefore lying would not serve self-interest. Results thus indicate that having limited cognitive capacity will unveil a tendency to be honest in a situation where having more cognitive capacity would have enabled one to serve self-interest by lying.Keywords: Deception, Cognitive Processing Capacity, Dual System, Ethical Decision-making",
keywords = "deception, cognitive processing capacity, morality, dual system, decision-making",
author = "{van 't Veer}, {Anna E.} and Marielle Stel and {van Beest}, Ilja",
year = "2014",
month = "5",
doi = "10.2139/ssrn.2351377",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "199--206",
journal = "Judgment and Decision Making",
issn = "1930-2975",
publisher = "Society for Judgment and Decision Making",
number = "3",

}

Limited capacity to lie : Cognitive load interferes with being dishonest. / van 't Veer, Anna E.; Stel, Marielle; van Beest, Ilja.

In: Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 9, No. 3, 05.2014, p. 199-206.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Limited capacity to lie

T2 - Cognitive load interferes with being dishonest

AU - van 't Veer, Anna E.

AU - Stel, Marielle

AU - van Beest, Ilja

PY - 2014/5

Y1 - 2014/5

N2 - The current study tested the boundary conditions of ethical decision-making by increasing cognitive load. This manipulation is believed to hinder deliberation, and, as we argue, reduces the cognitive capacity needed for a self-serving bias to occur. As telling a lie is believed to be more cognitively taxing than telling the truth, we hypothesized that participants would be more honest under high cognitive load than low cognitive load. 173 participants anonymously rolled a die three times and reported their outcomes – of which one of the rolls would be paid out – while either under high or low cognitive load. For the roll that determined pay, participants under low cognitive load, but not under high cognitive load, reported die rolls that were significantly different from a uniform (honest) distribution. The reported outcome of this roll was also significantly higher in the low load condition than in the high load condition, suggesting that participants in the low load condition lied to get higher pay. This pattern was not observed for the second and third roll where participants knew the rolls were not going to be paid out and where therefore lying would not serve self-interest. Results thus indicate that having limited cognitive capacity will unveil a tendency to be honest in a situation where having more cognitive capacity would have enabled one to serve self-interest by lying.Keywords: Deception, Cognitive Processing Capacity, Dual System, Ethical Decision-making

AB - The current study tested the boundary conditions of ethical decision-making by increasing cognitive load. This manipulation is believed to hinder deliberation, and, as we argue, reduces the cognitive capacity needed for a self-serving bias to occur. As telling a lie is believed to be more cognitively taxing than telling the truth, we hypothesized that participants would be more honest under high cognitive load than low cognitive load. 173 participants anonymously rolled a die three times and reported their outcomes – of which one of the rolls would be paid out – while either under high or low cognitive load. For the roll that determined pay, participants under low cognitive load, but not under high cognitive load, reported die rolls that were significantly different from a uniform (honest) distribution. The reported outcome of this roll was also significantly higher in the low load condition than in the high load condition, suggesting that participants in the low load condition lied to get higher pay. This pattern was not observed for the second and third roll where participants knew the rolls were not going to be paid out and where therefore lying would not serve self-interest. Results thus indicate that having limited cognitive capacity will unveil a tendency to be honest in a situation where having more cognitive capacity would have enabled one to serve self-interest by lying.Keywords: Deception, Cognitive Processing Capacity, Dual System, Ethical Decision-making

KW - deception

KW - cognitive processing capacity

KW - morality

KW - dual system

KW - decision-making

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10411/20416

U2 - 10.2139/ssrn.2351377

DO - 10.2139/ssrn.2351377

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 199

EP - 206

JO - Judgment and Decision Making

JF - Judgment and Decision Making

SN - 1930-2975

IS - 3

ER -