Abstract
Abstract: Banks individually optimize their liquidity risk management, often neglecting the externalities generated by their choices on the overall risk of the financial system. This is the main argument to support the regulation of liquidity risk. However, there may be incentives, related for instance to the role of the lender of last resort, for banks to optimize their choices not strictly at the individual level, but engaging instead in collective risk taking strategies, which may intensify systemic risk. In this paper we look for evidence of such herding behaviors, with an emphasis on the period preceding the global financial crisis. Herding is significant only among the largest banks, after adequately controlling for relevant endogeneity problems associated with the estimation of peer effects. This result suggests that the regulation of systemically important financial institutions may play an important role in mitigating this specific component of liquidity risk.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | Tilburg |
| Publisher | EBC |
| Number of pages | 43 |
| Volume | 2012-024 |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
Publication series
| Name | EBC Discussion Paper |
|---|---|
| Volume | 2012-024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- banks
- liquidity risk
- regulation
- herding
- peer effects
- Basel III
- macroprudential policy
- systemic risk
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Liquidity Risk in Banking: Is there Herding?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver