Lost without you: the Value of Falling out of Love

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    8 Citations (Scopus)
    96 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    In this paper we develop a view about the disorientation attached to the process of falling out of love and explain its prudential and moral value. We start with a brief background on theories of love and situate our argument within the views concerned with the lovers’ identities. Namely, love changes who we are. In the context of our paper, we explain this common tenet in the philosophy of love as a change in the lovers’ self-concepts through a process of mutual shaping. This, however, is potentially dangerous for people involved in what we call ‘subsuming relationships’, who give up too much autonomy in the process of mutual shaping. We then move on to show how, through the relation between love and the self-concept, we can explain why the process of falling out of love with someone is so disorientating: when one is falling out of love, one loses an important point of reference for self-understanding. While this disorientating process is typically taken to be harmful to the person experiencing it, we will explain how it can also have moral and prudential value. By re-evaluating who we were in the relationship and who we are now, we can escape from oppressive practices in subsuming relationships. We finish by arguing that this gives us reason to be wary of seeking to re-orient ourselves -or others- too quickly after falling out of love.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)515-529
    Number of pages15
    JournalEthical Theory and Moral Practice
    Volume23
    Issue number3-4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2020

    Keywords

    • Disorientation
    • Ethics
    • Ethics of love
    • Feminist philosophy
    • Philosophy of emotion
    • Philosophy of love

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Lost without you: the Value of Falling out of Love'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this