Abstract
The argument for applying borrower-based measures (BBMs) to non-banks to make these institutions more resilient is weaker than in the case of banks, as non-bank failures create fewer negative externalities. At the same time, the implications of extending the scope of BBMs to non-banks for income and wealth distributions may be more negative, as this would leave younger and poorer households with no options to obtain housing finance. Therefore, it is not obvious that countries that apply BBMs to banks should be required to apply them to non-banks as well.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | Brussels |
| Publisher | European Parliament |
| Commissioning body | European Parliament |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Publication status | Published - 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Macroprudential Policies Beyond Banking: The Case of Borrower-Based Measures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver