Make the manikin move

Symbolic approach-avoidance responses affect implicit and explicit face evaluations

Marcella L. Woud*, Joyce Maas, Eni S. Becker, Mike Rinck

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The present research aimed to replicate and extend findings of Huijding, Muris, Lester, Field, and Joosse (2011), investigating whether symbolic approach-avoidance responses can induce implicit and explicit evaluation biases. Faces with a neutral expression were shown on a computer screen, and participants were instructed to repeatedly move a manikin towards some faces (approach) and away from other faces (avoidance). An affective priming task and a face rating task were used to assess training-compatible differences in implicit and explicit face evaluations, respectively. Results showed that the manikin training was successful: The priming task revealed more positive implicit evaluations of approached than avoided faces, and approached faces were rated more positively than avoided ones in the face rating task. These findings replicate those of Huijding and colleagues by demonstrating training effects on explicit evaluations, and they extend them by demonstrating effects on implicit evaluations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)738-744
JournalJournal of Cognitive Psychology
Volume25
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Approach-avoidance training
  • Implicit and explicit face evaluations
  • Manikin task
  • APPROACH BIAS
  • ATTITUDES
  • BEHAVIORS
  • ALCOHOL
  • FEAR

Cite this

Woud, Marcella L. ; Maas, Joyce ; Becker, Eni S. ; Rinck, Mike. / Make the manikin move : Symbolic approach-avoidance responses affect implicit and explicit face evaluations. In: Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 2013 ; Vol. 25, No. 6. pp. 738-744.
@article{ba96481bcfad4926ad7b010a7018ec91,
title = "Make the manikin move: Symbolic approach-avoidance responses affect implicit and explicit face evaluations",
abstract = "The present research aimed to replicate and extend findings of Huijding, Muris, Lester, Field, and Joosse (2011), investigating whether symbolic approach-avoidance responses can induce implicit and explicit evaluation biases. Faces with a neutral expression were shown on a computer screen, and participants were instructed to repeatedly move a manikin towards some faces (approach) and away from other faces (avoidance). An affective priming task and a face rating task were used to assess training-compatible differences in implicit and explicit face evaluations, respectively. Results showed that the manikin training was successful: The priming task revealed more positive implicit evaluations of approached than avoided faces, and approached faces were rated more positively than avoided ones in the face rating task. These findings replicate those of Huijding and colleagues by demonstrating training effects on explicit evaluations, and they extend them by demonstrating effects on implicit evaluations.",
keywords = "Approach-avoidance training, Implicit and explicit face evaluations, Manikin task, APPROACH BIAS, ATTITUDES, BEHAVIORS, ALCOHOL, FEAR",
author = "Woud, {Marcella L.} and Joyce Maas and Becker, {Eni S.} and Mike Rinck",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/20445911.2013.817413",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "738--744",
journal = "Journal of Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "2044-592x",
publisher = "Psychology Press",
number = "6",

}

Make the manikin move : Symbolic approach-avoidance responses affect implicit and explicit face evaluations. / Woud, Marcella L.; Maas, Joyce; Becker, Eni S.; Rinck, Mike.

In: Journal of Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 25, No. 6, 01.09.2013, p. 738-744.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Make the manikin move

T2 - Symbolic approach-avoidance responses affect implicit and explicit face evaluations

AU - Woud, Marcella L.

AU - Maas, Joyce

AU - Becker, Eni S.

AU - Rinck, Mike

PY - 2013/9/1

Y1 - 2013/9/1

N2 - The present research aimed to replicate and extend findings of Huijding, Muris, Lester, Field, and Joosse (2011), investigating whether symbolic approach-avoidance responses can induce implicit and explicit evaluation biases. Faces with a neutral expression were shown on a computer screen, and participants were instructed to repeatedly move a manikin towards some faces (approach) and away from other faces (avoidance). An affective priming task and a face rating task were used to assess training-compatible differences in implicit and explicit face evaluations, respectively. Results showed that the manikin training was successful: The priming task revealed more positive implicit evaluations of approached than avoided faces, and approached faces were rated more positively than avoided ones in the face rating task. These findings replicate those of Huijding and colleagues by demonstrating training effects on explicit evaluations, and they extend them by demonstrating effects on implicit evaluations.

AB - The present research aimed to replicate and extend findings of Huijding, Muris, Lester, Field, and Joosse (2011), investigating whether symbolic approach-avoidance responses can induce implicit and explicit evaluation biases. Faces with a neutral expression were shown on a computer screen, and participants were instructed to repeatedly move a manikin towards some faces (approach) and away from other faces (avoidance). An affective priming task and a face rating task were used to assess training-compatible differences in implicit and explicit face evaluations, respectively. Results showed that the manikin training was successful: The priming task revealed more positive implicit evaluations of approached than avoided faces, and approached faces were rated more positively than avoided ones in the face rating task. These findings replicate those of Huijding and colleagues by demonstrating training effects on explicit evaluations, and they extend them by demonstrating effects on implicit evaluations.

KW - Approach-avoidance training

KW - Implicit and explicit face evaluations

KW - Manikin task

KW - APPROACH BIAS

KW - ATTITUDES

KW - BEHAVIORS

KW - ALCOHOL

KW - FEAR

U2 - 10.1080/20445911.2013.817413

DO - 10.1080/20445911.2013.817413

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 738

EP - 744

JO - Journal of Cognitive Psychology

JF - Journal of Cognitive Psychology

SN - 2044-592x

IS - 6

ER -