Management of mandated networks from a dynamic perspective

Federica Segato, J. Raab

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionScientific

Abstract

The management of networks has received increasing attention in recent years in the form of systematic empirical research. The general thrust of the results seem to indicate that network management resembles what we know about general management. However, there are also specific characteristics of networks that lead to a different emphasis of traditional management tasks and practices. Yet there are also new management tasks emerging which can be attributed to the fact that in networks there is no unified ownership of the problem and no unity of command. Mandell et al. (2017) therefore go even so far as to call for the development and use of a new management language. This paper contributes to our understanding of network management in two ways. First, we will discuss what network management tasks and practices we can observe in mandated networks and how they might differ from networks that develop more serendipitously. Second, we will analyze how these networks are managed in the different stages during the formation phase that is crucial for the further development and the performance of a network. A multiple case study has been conducted on four inter-organizational networks of healthcare providers, created to provide integrated care to chronic patients in the Lombardy Region (Italy). The results show that three managerial levels are present, neither of which exerts full control over the networks. In a situation, where multiple similar networks are mandated for different territorial entities, the management of network learning might emerge as an additional task if a variation of processes in the different networks is embraced to some extent and best practices diffused. Based on the findings we also suggest, how different management tasks and activities might be distributed over the different stages in the formation process.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationManagement of mandated networks from a dynamic perspective
Number of pages23
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Event2017 European Group for Public Administration Conference: Panel PSG XIX: Public Network Policy and Management - Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
Duration: 30 Aug 2017 → …

Conference

Conference2017 European Group for Public Administration Conference
CountryItaly
CityMilan
Period30/08/17 → …

Fingerprint

Network management
Multiple case study
Italy
Ownership
Healthcare
Best practice
General management
Empirical research
Interorganizational networks
Integrated
Network learning
Language

Cite this

Segato, F., & Raab, J. (2017). Management of mandated networks from a dynamic perspective. In Management of mandated networks from a dynamic perspective
Segato, Federica ; Raab, J. / Management of mandated networks from a dynamic perspective. Management of mandated networks from a dynamic perspective. 2017.
@inproceedings{f922097dac124952b5e1370f1e30a426,
title = "Management of mandated networks from a dynamic perspective",
abstract = "The management of networks has received increasing attention in recent years in the form of systematic empirical research. The general thrust of the results seem to indicate that network management resembles what we know about general management. However, there are also specific characteristics of networks that lead to a different emphasis of traditional management tasks and practices. Yet there are also new management tasks emerging which can be attributed to the fact that in networks there is no unified ownership of the problem and no unity of command. Mandell et al. (2017) therefore go even so far as to call for the development and use of a new management language. This paper contributes to our understanding of network management in two ways. First, we will discuss what network management tasks and practices we can observe in mandated networks and how they might differ from networks that develop more serendipitously. Second, we will analyze how these networks are managed in the different stages during the formation phase that is crucial for the further development and the performance of a network. A multiple case study has been conducted on four inter-organizational networks of healthcare providers, created to provide integrated care to chronic patients in the Lombardy Region (Italy). The results show that three managerial levels are present, neither of which exerts full control over the networks. In a situation, where multiple similar networks are mandated for different territorial entities, the management of network learning might emerge as an additional task if a variation of processes in the different networks is embraced to some extent and best practices diffused. Based on the findings we also suggest, how different management tasks and activities might be distributed over the different stages in the formation process.",
author = "Federica Segato and J. Raab",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
booktitle = "Management of mandated networks from a dynamic perspective",

}

Segato, F & Raab, J 2017, Management of mandated networks from a dynamic perspective. in Management of mandated networks from a dynamic perspective. 2017 European Group for Public Administration Conference, Milan, Italy, 30/08/17.

Management of mandated networks from a dynamic perspective. / Segato, Federica; Raab, J.

Management of mandated networks from a dynamic perspective. 2017.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionScientific

TY - GEN

T1 - Management of mandated networks from a dynamic perspective

AU - Segato, Federica

AU - Raab, J.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The management of networks has received increasing attention in recent years in the form of systematic empirical research. The general thrust of the results seem to indicate that network management resembles what we know about general management. However, there are also specific characteristics of networks that lead to a different emphasis of traditional management tasks and practices. Yet there are also new management tasks emerging which can be attributed to the fact that in networks there is no unified ownership of the problem and no unity of command. Mandell et al. (2017) therefore go even so far as to call for the development and use of a new management language. This paper contributes to our understanding of network management in two ways. First, we will discuss what network management tasks and practices we can observe in mandated networks and how they might differ from networks that develop more serendipitously. Second, we will analyze how these networks are managed in the different stages during the formation phase that is crucial for the further development and the performance of a network. A multiple case study has been conducted on four inter-organizational networks of healthcare providers, created to provide integrated care to chronic patients in the Lombardy Region (Italy). The results show that three managerial levels are present, neither of which exerts full control over the networks. In a situation, where multiple similar networks are mandated for different territorial entities, the management of network learning might emerge as an additional task if a variation of processes in the different networks is embraced to some extent and best practices diffused. Based on the findings we also suggest, how different management tasks and activities might be distributed over the different stages in the formation process.

AB - The management of networks has received increasing attention in recent years in the form of systematic empirical research. The general thrust of the results seem to indicate that network management resembles what we know about general management. However, there are also specific characteristics of networks that lead to a different emphasis of traditional management tasks and practices. Yet there are also new management tasks emerging which can be attributed to the fact that in networks there is no unified ownership of the problem and no unity of command. Mandell et al. (2017) therefore go even so far as to call for the development and use of a new management language. This paper contributes to our understanding of network management in two ways. First, we will discuss what network management tasks and practices we can observe in mandated networks and how they might differ from networks that develop more serendipitously. Second, we will analyze how these networks are managed in the different stages during the formation phase that is crucial for the further development and the performance of a network. A multiple case study has been conducted on four inter-organizational networks of healthcare providers, created to provide integrated care to chronic patients in the Lombardy Region (Italy). The results show that three managerial levels are present, neither of which exerts full control over the networks. In a situation, where multiple similar networks are mandated for different territorial entities, the management of network learning might emerge as an additional task if a variation of processes in the different networks is embraced to some extent and best practices diffused. Based on the findings we also suggest, how different management tasks and activities might be distributed over the different stages in the formation process.

M3 - Conference contribution

BT - Management of mandated networks from a dynamic perspective

ER -

Segato F, Raab J. Management of mandated networks from a dynamic perspective. In Management of mandated networks from a dynamic perspective. 2017