Management’s causal reasoning on performance and earnings management

W.A.A. Aerts, S. Zhang

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    We investigate the association between the intensity of causal reasoning on performance in a firm’s annual management commentary and its earnings management propensity. Anticipated earnings management concerns are argued to constitute a significant accountability predicament, bringing management to offer more intense causal reasoning in order to mitigate investors’ earnings management concerns. We use computer-intensive techniques to measure causal reasoning intensity as a generic disclosure quality in the management commentary of a large sample of US firms from 1999 to 2007. We find that accruals earnings management (signed discretionary accruals) is positively associated with causal reasoning intensity. The positive association holds for alternative specifications of accruals earnings management (an earnings management dummy model and an analyst expectations model) and in a change model. Our results are consistent with the assertion that firms strategically use causal reasoning on performance to establish appropriateness and cognitive legitimacy, increase perceived plausibility of reported performance and mitigate performance-related concerns of investors.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)770-783
    JournalEuropean Management Journal
    Volume32
    Issue number5
    Early online date22 Jan 2014
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2014

    Fingerprint

    Performance management
    Earnings management
    Accruals
    Investors
    Legitimacy
    Computer use
    Discretionary accruals
    Analysts
    Accountability
    Appropriateness
    Disclosure quality
    Propensity

    Keywords

    • earnings management
    • causal reasoning
    • management commentary

    Cite this

    @article{3fb6aaedbdf44736af5e5d3f34f5b5d2,
    title = "Management’s causal reasoning on performance and earnings management",
    abstract = "We investigate the association between the intensity of causal reasoning on performance in a firm’s annual management commentary and its earnings management propensity. Anticipated earnings management concerns are argued to constitute a significant accountability predicament, bringing management to offer more intense causal reasoning in order to mitigate investors’ earnings management concerns. We use computer-intensive techniques to measure causal reasoning intensity as a generic disclosure quality in the management commentary of a large sample of US firms from 1999 to 2007. We find that accruals earnings management (signed discretionary accruals) is positively associated with causal reasoning intensity. The positive association holds for alternative specifications of accruals earnings management (an earnings management dummy model and an analyst expectations model) and in a change model. Our results are consistent with the assertion that firms strategically use causal reasoning on performance to establish appropriateness and cognitive legitimacy, increase perceived plausibility of reported performance and mitigate performance-related concerns of investors.",
    keywords = "earnings management, causal reasoning, management commentary",
    author = "W.A.A. Aerts and S. Zhang",
    year = "2014",
    month = "10",
    doi = "10.1016/j.emj.2013.12.006",
    language = "English",
    volume = "32",
    pages = "770--783",
    journal = "European Management Journal",
    issn = "0263-2373",
    publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
    number = "5",

    }

    Management’s causal reasoning on performance and earnings management. / Aerts, W.A.A.; Zhang, S.

    In: European Management Journal, Vol. 32, No. 5, 10.2014, p. 770-783.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Management’s causal reasoning on performance and earnings management

    AU - Aerts, W.A.A.

    AU - Zhang, S.

    PY - 2014/10

    Y1 - 2014/10

    N2 - We investigate the association between the intensity of causal reasoning on performance in a firm’s annual management commentary and its earnings management propensity. Anticipated earnings management concerns are argued to constitute a significant accountability predicament, bringing management to offer more intense causal reasoning in order to mitigate investors’ earnings management concerns. We use computer-intensive techniques to measure causal reasoning intensity as a generic disclosure quality in the management commentary of a large sample of US firms from 1999 to 2007. We find that accruals earnings management (signed discretionary accruals) is positively associated with causal reasoning intensity. The positive association holds for alternative specifications of accruals earnings management (an earnings management dummy model and an analyst expectations model) and in a change model. Our results are consistent with the assertion that firms strategically use causal reasoning on performance to establish appropriateness and cognitive legitimacy, increase perceived plausibility of reported performance and mitigate performance-related concerns of investors.

    AB - We investigate the association between the intensity of causal reasoning on performance in a firm’s annual management commentary and its earnings management propensity. Anticipated earnings management concerns are argued to constitute a significant accountability predicament, bringing management to offer more intense causal reasoning in order to mitigate investors’ earnings management concerns. We use computer-intensive techniques to measure causal reasoning intensity as a generic disclosure quality in the management commentary of a large sample of US firms from 1999 to 2007. We find that accruals earnings management (signed discretionary accruals) is positively associated with causal reasoning intensity. The positive association holds for alternative specifications of accruals earnings management (an earnings management dummy model and an analyst expectations model) and in a change model. Our results are consistent with the assertion that firms strategically use causal reasoning on performance to establish appropriateness and cognitive legitimacy, increase perceived plausibility of reported performance and mitigate performance-related concerns of investors.

    KW - earnings management

    KW - causal reasoning

    KW - management commentary

    U2 - 10.1016/j.emj.2013.12.006

    DO - 10.1016/j.emj.2013.12.006

    M3 - Article

    VL - 32

    SP - 770

    EP - 783

    JO - European Management Journal

    JF - European Management Journal

    SN - 0263-2373

    IS - 5

    ER -