Marketing budget allocation across countries: The role of the international business cycle

Y. Peers, H.J. van Heerde, Marnik Dekimpe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

A key conundrum facing organizations is how to adjust marketing budgets in response to the business cycle. While most firms use procyclical spending (spending less during economic contractions), academic studies often recommend countercyclical spending (spending more during contractions), which begs the question what is the right thing to do. The spending problem is compounded further when demand is not just driven by one country’s business cycle, but by the (non-synchronized) business cycles of multiple countries, as is the case for tourism marketing aiming to attract international tourists originating from different countries. We derive insights into the best way to allocate marketing budgets across countries under varying economic conditions. We show that the allocation decisions are driven by the pro- versus countercyclical nature of three factors: unit sales, marketing effectiveness, and per-unit profit contribution. To study how unit sales and marketing effectiveness respond to the business cycle, we develop a Transfer Function Dynamic Hierarchical Linear Model. We also model the responsiveness of the profit contribution to the business cycle. In an application to New Zealand tourism marketing, we find that a reallocation of the government’s marketing budget could yield an increase in tourist revenues of 121 million NZ dollars.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)792-809
JournalMarketing Science
Volume36
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2017

Fingerprint

Budget allocation
Business cycles
Marketing
International business cycles
Marketing effectiveness
Tourists
Contraction
Profit
Tourism marketing
Responsiveness
Hierarchical linear models
New Zealand
Economics
Revenue
Government
Reallocation
Factors
Economic conditions
Transfer function

Keywords

  • business cycle
  • optimal allocation
  • recession
  • international tourism
  • Bayesian models
  • regression

Cite this

@article{6e72ffe02c2043da8b10f66ce5b15aa3,
title = "Marketing budget allocation across countries: The role of the international business cycle",
abstract = "A key conundrum facing organizations is how to adjust marketing budgets in response to the business cycle. While most firms use procyclical spending (spending less during economic contractions), academic studies often recommend countercyclical spending (spending more during contractions), which begs the question what is the right thing to do. The spending problem is compounded further when demand is not just driven by one country’s business cycle, but by the (non-synchronized) business cycles of multiple countries, as is the case for tourism marketing aiming to attract international tourists originating from different countries. We derive insights into the best way to allocate marketing budgets across countries under varying economic conditions. We show that the allocation decisions are driven by the pro- versus countercyclical nature of three factors: unit sales, marketing effectiveness, and per-unit profit contribution. To study how unit sales and marketing effectiveness respond to the business cycle, we develop a Transfer Function Dynamic Hierarchical Linear Model. We also model the responsiveness of the profit contribution to the business cycle. In an application to New Zealand tourism marketing, we find that a reallocation of the government’s marketing budget could yield an increase in tourist revenues of 121 million NZ dollars.",
keywords = "business cycle, optimal allocation, recession, international tourism, Bayesian models, regression",
author = "Y. Peers and {van Heerde}, H.J. and Marnik Dekimpe",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1287/mksc.2017.1046",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "792--809",
journal = "Marketing Science",
issn = "0732-2399",
publisher = "INFORMS Inst.for Operations Res.and the Management Sciences",
number = "5",

}

Marketing budget allocation across countries : The role of the international business cycle. / Peers, Y.; van Heerde, H.J.; Dekimpe, Marnik.

In: Marketing Science, Vol. 36, No. 5, 10.2017, p. 792-809.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Marketing budget allocation across countries

T2 - The role of the international business cycle

AU - Peers, Y.

AU - van Heerde, H.J.

AU - Dekimpe, Marnik

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - A key conundrum facing organizations is how to adjust marketing budgets in response to the business cycle. While most firms use procyclical spending (spending less during economic contractions), academic studies often recommend countercyclical spending (spending more during contractions), which begs the question what is the right thing to do. The spending problem is compounded further when demand is not just driven by one country’s business cycle, but by the (non-synchronized) business cycles of multiple countries, as is the case for tourism marketing aiming to attract international tourists originating from different countries. We derive insights into the best way to allocate marketing budgets across countries under varying economic conditions. We show that the allocation decisions are driven by the pro- versus countercyclical nature of three factors: unit sales, marketing effectiveness, and per-unit profit contribution. To study how unit sales and marketing effectiveness respond to the business cycle, we develop a Transfer Function Dynamic Hierarchical Linear Model. We also model the responsiveness of the profit contribution to the business cycle. In an application to New Zealand tourism marketing, we find that a reallocation of the government’s marketing budget could yield an increase in tourist revenues of 121 million NZ dollars.

AB - A key conundrum facing organizations is how to adjust marketing budgets in response to the business cycle. While most firms use procyclical spending (spending less during economic contractions), academic studies often recommend countercyclical spending (spending more during contractions), which begs the question what is the right thing to do. The spending problem is compounded further when demand is not just driven by one country’s business cycle, but by the (non-synchronized) business cycles of multiple countries, as is the case for tourism marketing aiming to attract international tourists originating from different countries. We derive insights into the best way to allocate marketing budgets across countries under varying economic conditions. We show that the allocation decisions are driven by the pro- versus countercyclical nature of three factors: unit sales, marketing effectiveness, and per-unit profit contribution. To study how unit sales and marketing effectiveness respond to the business cycle, we develop a Transfer Function Dynamic Hierarchical Linear Model. We also model the responsiveness of the profit contribution to the business cycle. In an application to New Zealand tourism marketing, we find that a reallocation of the government’s marketing budget could yield an increase in tourist revenues of 121 million NZ dollars.

KW - business cycle

KW - optimal allocation

KW - recession

KW - international tourism

KW - Bayesian models

KW - regression

U2 - 10.1287/mksc.2017.1046

DO - 10.1287/mksc.2017.1046

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 792

EP - 809

JO - Marketing Science

JF - Marketing Science

SN - 0732-2399

IS - 5

ER -