Match-fixing: The current discussion in Europe and the case of the Netherlands

Antonius Spapens, M. Olfers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Match-fixing is a topic that captures the imagination of the public and increasingly attracts academic interest as well. Manipulation of sports games can be sports related, to achieve a better result for the team or a player, or gambling related to gain financially from the outcome. This paper describes the results of an empirical study of match-fixing in The Netherlands and analyses the main risk factors involved. These are social relations of persons involved in sports with criminals; the availability of the game for betting; financial difficulties of clubs, players and others who can influence the out¬come of a match, and gambling addiction. Currently, match-fixing is high on the agenda of sports associations, gambling operators and government institutions on both the national and international levels. The ‘Convention on the manipulation of sports competitions’ drawn up by the Council of Europe encompasses a broad range of measures and can be viewed as the leading international initiative to curb match-fixing. Finally, we argue that the importance of sports in society requires more thor¬ough and comparative empirical research of the scope and nature of the problem, on non-gambling related match-fixing, and on the relationship between sports-betting and manipulation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)333-358
Number of pages25
JournalEuropean Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice
Volume23
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Match-fixing: The current discussion in Europe and the case of the Netherlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this