Abstract
Compositionality is a primary feature of language, but graphics can also create combinatorial meaning, like with items above faces (e.g., lightbulbs to mean inspiration). We posit that these “upfixes” (i.e., upwards affixes) involve a productive schema enabling both stored and novel face–upfix dyads. In two experiments, participants viewed either conventional (e.g., lightbulb) or unconventional (e.g., clover-leaves) upfixes with faces which either matched (e.g., lightbulb/smile) or mismatched (e.g., lightbulb/frown). In Experiment 1, matching dyads sponsored higher comprehensibility ratings and faster response times, modulated by conventionality. In Experiment 2, event-related brain potentials (ERPs) revealed conventional upfixes, regardless of matching, evoked larger N250s, indicating perceptual expertise, but mismatching and unconventional dyads elicited larger semantic processing costs (N400) than conventional-matching dyads. Yet mismatches evoked a late negativity, suggesting congruent novel dyads remained construable compared with violations. These results support that combinatorial graphics involve a constrained productive schema, similar to the lexicon of language.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1381-1398 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Memory and Cognition |
Volume | 50 |
Issue number | 7 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2022 |
Keywords
- Affixation
- Compositionality
- Morphology
- Visual language
- Evoked Potentials/physiology
- Language
- Reaction Time/physiology
- Semantics
- Humans
- Female
- Male
- Electroencephalography
- N400
- Word
- Comprehension
- Semantic Integration
- Recognition
- Context
- Predictability
- Electrophysiological Evidence
- Vocabulary
- Event-related Potentials