Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Measurement invariance in international large-scale assessments: Integrating theory and method

  • Deana Desa
  • , Fons van de Vijver
  • , Ralph Carsten
  • , Wolfram Schulz

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

    Abstract


    This chapter reviews the basic concept of measurement invariance and its challenges with regard to international large-scale assessments (ILSAs). It examines to integrate measurement invariance evaluations with substantive insights into measurement bias. The chapter argues beyond the existing measurement invariance evaluation that a generic latent structural and measurement modeling or the simple structure of a common-factor model is unlikely to yield fully comparable scores within the contexts of ILSAs. It provides a stepwise strategy for evaluating measurement invariance with a productive way of dealing with the unattainable ideal of scalar invariance. The chapter presents an empirical example using ILSA data and discusses some general issues in evaluating measurement invariance across many groups along with considering limitations and strategies. It also presents analyses of questionnaire data and an integration of theory and method in measurement invariance evaluation within the context of ILSAs in order to evaluate the possibility of mean comparisons across countries.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationAdvances in Comparative Survey Methodology
    Subtitle of host publicationMultinational, Multiregional, and Multicultural Contexts (3MC)
    EditorsTimothy P. Johnson, Beth-Ellen Pennell, Ineke A.L. Stoop, Brita Dorer
    PublisherWiley
    Chapter40
    Pages881-910
    Number of pages30
    ISBN (Electronic)9781118884997
    ISBN (Print)9781118884980
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2019

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Measurement invariance in international large-scale assessments: Integrating theory and method'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this