Measures for dealing with competence and integrity violations of interorganizational trust at the corporate and operating levels of organizational hierarchy

M.K. Janowicz-Panjaitan, R. Krishnan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

We examine how partners in an interorganizational relationship can repair violated trust, and if that is impossible, how they can preserve the collaborative relationship. We also consider under what circumstances exit from the relationship is the only viable option. We propose that the effectiveness of legalistic and non-legalistic measures in response to a trust violation is a function of the hierarchical level at which the violation occurred (corporate vs. operating), the character of the violation (competence vs. integrity), the frequency and severity with which it occurred, the organizational context in which boundary spanners are embedded, and the degree of dependence between the partners. Based on these factors, we explore how the way in which violation of trust is dealt with at one hierarchical level might affect trust at the other level. Our theoretical model reveals that prior findings on trust repair in inter-personal context may not hold in the interorganizational context.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)245-268
JournalJournal of management studies
Volume46
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Repair
Violations
Inter-organizational trust
Integrity
Trust repair

Cite this

@article{94035fd090c24328844cffe81c50a45d,
title = "Measures for dealing with competence and integrity violations of interorganizational trust at the corporate and operating levels of organizational hierarchy",
abstract = "We examine how partners in an interorganizational relationship can repair violated trust, and if that is impossible, how they can preserve the collaborative relationship. We also consider under what circumstances exit from the relationship is the only viable option. We propose that the effectiveness of legalistic and non-legalistic measures in response to a trust violation is a function of the hierarchical level at which the violation occurred (corporate vs. operating), the character of the violation (competence vs. integrity), the frequency and severity with which it occurred, the organizational context in which boundary spanners are embedded, and the degree of dependence between the partners. Based on these factors, we explore how the way in which violation of trust is dealt with at one hierarchical level might affect trust at the other level. Our theoretical model reveals that prior findings on trust repair in inter-personal context may not hold in the interorganizational context.",
author = "M.K. Janowicz-Panjaitan and R. Krishnan",
year = "2009",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "245--268",
journal = "Journal of Management Studies",
issn = "0022-2380",
publisher = "WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC",
number = "2",

}

Measures for dealing with competence and integrity violations of interorganizational trust at the corporate and operating levels of organizational hierarchy. / Janowicz-Panjaitan, M.K.; Krishnan, R.

In: Journal of management studies, Vol. 46, No. 2, 2009, p. 245-268.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measures for dealing with competence and integrity violations of interorganizational trust at the corporate and operating levels of organizational hierarchy

AU - Janowicz-Panjaitan, M.K.

AU - Krishnan, R.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - We examine how partners in an interorganizational relationship can repair violated trust, and if that is impossible, how they can preserve the collaborative relationship. We also consider under what circumstances exit from the relationship is the only viable option. We propose that the effectiveness of legalistic and non-legalistic measures in response to a trust violation is a function of the hierarchical level at which the violation occurred (corporate vs. operating), the character of the violation (competence vs. integrity), the frequency and severity with which it occurred, the organizational context in which boundary spanners are embedded, and the degree of dependence between the partners. Based on these factors, we explore how the way in which violation of trust is dealt with at one hierarchical level might affect trust at the other level. Our theoretical model reveals that prior findings on trust repair in inter-personal context may not hold in the interorganizational context.

AB - We examine how partners in an interorganizational relationship can repair violated trust, and if that is impossible, how they can preserve the collaborative relationship. We also consider under what circumstances exit from the relationship is the only viable option. We propose that the effectiveness of legalistic and non-legalistic measures in response to a trust violation is a function of the hierarchical level at which the violation occurred (corporate vs. operating), the character of the violation (competence vs. integrity), the frequency and severity with which it occurred, the organizational context in which boundary spanners are embedded, and the degree of dependence between the partners. Based on these factors, we explore how the way in which violation of trust is dealt with at one hierarchical level might affect trust at the other level. Our theoretical model reveals that prior findings on trust repair in inter-personal context may not hold in the interorganizational context.

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 245

EP - 268

JO - Journal of Management Studies

JF - Journal of Management Studies

SN - 0022-2380

IS - 2

ER -