TY - JOUR
T1 - Measuring anxiety symptoms – psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Lehrer–Woolfolk Anxiety Scale Questionnaire
AU - Peerbooms, Vivian
AU - van den Boogaard, Th Michael
AU - Melchior, Kim
AU - Jongerling, Joran
AU - van der Heiden, Colin
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - The Lehrer–Woolfolk Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire (LWASQ) is a self-report questionnaire based on the tripartite model of Lang (1971) for measuring treatment progress. However, so far little is known about its psychometric qualities. Two studies were conducted to get more clarity on the factor structure and reliability of the LWASQ. Method: Factor structure and internal consistency of the LWASQ were assessed using a sample of 2,117 patients with anxiety disorders. Test–retest reliability was measured with a three-week interval, using a sample of 49 people in a general population. We aimed to measure construct validity with a third sample of patients with anxiety disorders, but were not able to due to a small sample size. Results: Factor analysis confirmed the three known factors of the LWASQ, i.e., somatic complaints, cognitive problems, and behavioral complaints. Both internal consistency for all three subscales (r =.852–.927) and test–retest reliability were found to be good (r =.88). Conclusion: Psychometric properties of the LWASQ are promising, but further validation is needed to draw more definitive conclusions regarding its usefulness in a clinical population.
AB - The Lehrer–Woolfolk Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire (LWASQ) is a self-report questionnaire based on the tripartite model of Lang (1971) for measuring treatment progress. However, so far little is known about its psychometric qualities. Two studies were conducted to get more clarity on the factor structure and reliability of the LWASQ. Method: Factor structure and internal consistency of the LWASQ were assessed using a sample of 2,117 patients with anxiety disorders. Test–retest reliability was measured with a three-week interval, using a sample of 49 people in a general population. We aimed to measure construct validity with a third sample of patients with anxiety disorders, but were not able to due to a small sample size. Results: Factor analysis confirmed the three known factors of the LWASQ, i.e., somatic complaints, cognitive problems, and behavioral complaints. Both internal consistency for all three subscales (r =.852–.927) and test–retest reliability were found to be good (r =.88). Conclusion: Psychometric properties of the LWASQ are promising, but further validation is needed to draw more definitive conclusions regarding its usefulness in a clinical population.
KW - anxiety disorders
KW - factor analysis
KW - LWASQ
KW - tripartite model
KW - validation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85184168419&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1027/2698-1866/a000063
DO - 10.1027/2698-1866/a000063
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85184168419
SN - 2698-1866
VL - 5
SP - 46
EP - 53
JO - Psychological Test Adaptation and Development
JF - Psychological Test Adaptation and Development
IS - 1
ER -