Measuring exposure to bullying at work: The validity and advantages of the latent class cluster approach

G. Notelaers, S. Einarsen, H. de Witte, J.K. Vermunt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

493 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper addresses the construct and predictive validity of two methods for classifying respondents as victims of workplace bullying. Although bullying is conceived as a complex phenomenon, the dominant method used in bullying surveys, the operational classification method, only distinguishes two groups: victims versus non-victims. Hence, the complex nature of workplace bullying may not be accounted for. Therefore a latent class cluster approach is suggested to model the data, which was obtained by using the Negative Acts Questionnaire (NAQ) administered to employees in Belgium (n=6,175). Latent class modelling is a method of analysis that does not appear to have been used in occupational health psychology before. In this study, six latent classes emerged: “not bullied,” “limited work criticism,” “limited negative encounters,” “sometimes bullied,” “work related bullied,” and “victims.” The results show that compared to the traditional operational classification method, the latent class cluster approach shows higher construct and higher predictive validity with respect to self-assessments and indicators of strain and well-being at work. The consequences of these results for theory, future research, and practice are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)289-302
JournalWork & Stress
Volume20
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Workplace
Occupational Health
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

@article{62669a623246484492a9a900422dff61,
title = "Measuring exposure to bullying at work: The validity and advantages of the latent class cluster approach",
abstract = "This paper addresses the construct and predictive validity of two methods for classifying respondents as victims of workplace bullying. Although bullying is conceived as a complex phenomenon, the dominant method used in bullying surveys, the operational classification method, only distinguishes two groups: victims versus non-victims. Hence, the complex nature of workplace bullying may not be accounted for. Therefore a latent class cluster approach is suggested to model the data, which was obtained by using the Negative Acts Questionnaire (NAQ) administered to employees in Belgium (n=6,175). Latent class modelling is a method of analysis that does not appear to have been used in occupational health psychology before. In this study, six latent classes emerged: “not bullied,” “limited work criticism,” “limited negative encounters,” “sometimes bullied,” “work related bullied,” and “victims.” The results show that compared to the traditional operational classification method, the latent class cluster approach shows higher construct and higher predictive validity with respect to self-assessments and indicators of strain and well-being at work. The consequences of these results for theory, future research, and practice are discussed.",
author = "G. Notelaers and S. Einarsen and {de Witte}, H. and J.K. Vermunt",
year = "2006",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "289--302",
journal = "Work & Stress",
issn = "0267-8373",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

Measuring exposure to bullying at work : The validity and advantages of the latent class cluster approach. / Notelaers, G.; Einarsen, S.; de Witte, H.; Vermunt, J.K.

In: Work & Stress, Vol. 20, No. 4, 2006, p. 289-302.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring exposure to bullying at work

T2 - The validity and advantages of the latent class cluster approach

AU - Notelaers, G.

AU - Einarsen, S.

AU - de Witte, H.

AU - Vermunt, J.K.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - This paper addresses the construct and predictive validity of two methods for classifying respondents as victims of workplace bullying. Although bullying is conceived as a complex phenomenon, the dominant method used in bullying surveys, the operational classification method, only distinguishes two groups: victims versus non-victims. Hence, the complex nature of workplace bullying may not be accounted for. Therefore a latent class cluster approach is suggested to model the data, which was obtained by using the Negative Acts Questionnaire (NAQ) administered to employees in Belgium (n=6,175). Latent class modelling is a method of analysis that does not appear to have been used in occupational health psychology before. In this study, six latent classes emerged: “not bullied,” “limited work criticism,” “limited negative encounters,” “sometimes bullied,” “work related bullied,” and “victims.” The results show that compared to the traditional operational classification method, the latent class cluster approach shows higher construct and higher predictive validity with respect to self-assessments and indicators of strain and well-being at work. The consequences of these results for theory, future research, and practice are discussed.

AB - This paper addresses the construct and predictive validity of two methods for classifying respondents as victims of workplace bullying. Although bullying is conceived as a complex phenomenon, the dominant method used in bullying surveys, the operational classification method, only distinguishes two groups: victims versus non-victims. Hence, the complex nature of workplace bullying may not be accounted for. Therefore a latent class cluster approach is suggested to model the data, which was obtained by using the Negative Acts Questionnaire (NAQ) administered to employees in Belgium (n=6,175). Latent class modelling is a method of analysis that does not appear to have been used in occupational health psychology before. In this study, six latent classes emerged: “not bullied,” “limited work criticism,” “limited negative encounters,” “sometimes bullied,” “work related bullied,” and “victims.” The results show that compared to the traditional operational classification method, the latent class cluster approach shows higher construct and higher predictive validity with respect to self-assessments and indicators of strain and well-being at work. The consequences of these results for theory, future research, and practice are discussed.

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 289

EP - 302

JO - Work & Stress

JF - Work & Stress

SN - 0267-8373

IS - 4

ER -