Measuring population health from a broader perspective: Assessing the My Quality of Life Questionnaire

R.J.P. Hendrikx*, H. W. Drewes, M.D. Spreeuwenberg, D. Ruwaard, M. Huuksloot, C. Zijderveld, C. A. Baan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction:
Population health perspectives increasingly focus on people’s perception of resilience, ability to adapt and self-manage. The goal of this study is to determine whether the MijnKwaliteitVanLeven.nl (“MyQualityOfLife.nl”) survey is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the broader health perspectives at population level.

Methods:
19,809 entries of the MyQualityOfLife.nl survey were used. To assess face validity, Huber’s six dimensions of positive health were used as a framework for expert feedback. A confirmative factor analyses was done using the expert’s item clustering, followed by data-driven explorative factor analyses and reliability tests.

Results:
Experts distributed 74 of the 118 items over all six dimensions of positive health. The confirmatory factor analysis model based on expert classification was not confirmed. The subsequent exploratory factor analysis excluded most items based on factor loading and suggested two factors; ‘quality of life’ and ‘daily functioning’, both showing excellent reliability.

Conclusion:
The MyQualityOfLife.nl survey can assess the broader concept of health in a population as well as ‘quality of life’ and ‘daily functioning’. However, the survey can currently not evaluate several of the positive health dimensions separately. Further research is needed to determine whether this is due to the instrument or the positive health dimensions.
Original languageEnglish
Article number7
JournalInternational Journal of Integrated Care
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

quality of life
questionnaire
Statistical Factor Analysis
health
expert
factor analysis
demographic situation
Surveys and Questionnaires
resilience
Cluster Analysis
ability

Keywords

  • AUTONOMY
  • CARE
  • DEFINING HEALTH
  • IMPACT
  • PARTICIPATION
  • SF-12
  • Triple Aim
  • evaluation
  • population health
  • positive health

Cite this

Hendrikx, R.J.P. ; Drewes, H. W. ; Spreeuwenberg, M.D. ; Ruwaard, D. ; Huuksloot, M. ; Zijderveld, C. ; Baan, C. A. / Measuring population health from a broader perspective : Assessing the My Quality of Life Questionnaire. In: International Journal of Integrated Care. 2019 ; Vol. 19, No. 2.
@article{a04b680bcf774794bf0cf635ba2023e6,
title = "Measuring population health from a broader perspective: Assessing the My Quality of Life Questionnaire",
abstract = "Introduction: Population health perspectives increasingly focus on people’s perception of resilience, ability to adapt and self-manage. The goal of this study is to determine whether the MijnKwaliteitVanLeven.nl (“MyQualityOfLife.nl”) survey is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the broader health perspectives at population level.Methods: 19,809 entries of the MyQualityOfLife.nl survey were used. To assess face validity, Huber’s six dimensions of positive health were used as a framework for expert feedback. A confirmative factor analyses was done using the expert’s item clustering, followed by data-driven explorative factor analyses and reliability tests.Results: Experts distributed 74 of the 118 items over all six dimensions of positive health. The confirmatory factor analysis model based on expert classification was not confirmed. The subsequent exploratory factor analysis excluded most items based on factor loading and suggested two factors; ‘quality of life’ and ‘daily functioning’, both showing excellent reliability.Conclusion: The MyQualityOfLife.nl survey can assess the broader concept of health in a population as well as ‘quality of life’ and ‘daily functioning’. However, the survey can currently not evaluate several of the positive health dimensions separately. Further research is needed to determine whether this is due to the instrument or the positive health dimensions.",
keywords = "AUTONOMY, CARE, DEFINING HEALTH, IMPACT, PARTICIPATION, SF-12, Triple Aim, evaluation, population health, positive health",
author = "R.J.P. Hendrikx and Drewes, {H. W.} and M.D. Spreeuwenberg and D. Ruwaard and M. Huuksloot and C. Zijderveld and Baan, {C. A.}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.5334/ijic.3967",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
journal = "International Journal of Integrated Care",
issn = "1568-4156",
publisher = "IGITUR, UTRECHT PUBLISHING & ARCHIVING SERVICES",
number = "2",

}

Measuring population health from a broader perspective : Assessing the My Quality of Life Questionnaire. / Hendrikx, R.J.P.; Drewes, H. W.; Spreeuwenberg, M.D.; Ruwaard, D.; Huuksloot, M.; Zijderveld, C.; Baan, C. A.

In: International Journal of Integrated Care, Vol. 19, No. 2, 7, 2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring population health from a broader perspective

T2 - Assessing the My Quality of Life Questionnaire

AU - Hendrikx, R.J.P.

AU - Drewes, H. W.

AU - Spreeuwenberg, M.D.

AU - Ruwaard, D.

AU - Huuksloot, M.

AU - Zijderveld, C.

AU - Baan, C. A.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Introduction: Population health perspectives increasingly focus on people’s perception of resilience, ability to adapt and self-manage. The goal of this study is to determine whether the MijnKwaliteitVanLeven.nl (“MyQualityOfLife.nl”) survey is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the broader health perspectives at population level.Methods: 19,809 entries of the MyQualityOfLife.nl survey were used. To assess face validity, Huber’s six dimensions of positive health were used as a framework for expert feedback. A confirmative factor analyses was done using the expert’s item clustering, followed by data-driven explorative factor analyses and reliability tests.Results: Experts distributed 74 of the 118 items over all six dimensions of positive health. The confirmatory factor analysis model based on expert classification was not confirmed. The subsequent exploratory factor analysis excluded most items based on factor loading and suggested two factors; ‘quality of life’ and ‘daily functioning’, both showing excellent reliability.Conclusion: The MyQualityOfLife.nl survey can assess the broader concept of health in a population as well as ‘quality of life’ and ‘daily functioning’. However, the survey can currently not evaluate several of the positive health dimensions separately. Further research is needed to determine whether this is due to the instrument or the positive health dimensions.

AB - Introduction: Population health perspectives increasingly focus on people’s perception of resilience, ability to adapt and self-manage. The goal of this study is to determine whether the MijnKwaliteitVanLeven.nl (“MyQualityOfLife.nl”) survey is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the broader health perspectives at population level.Methods: 19,809 entries of the MyQualityOfLife.nl survey were used. To assess face validity, Huber’s six dimensions of positive health were used as a framework for expert feedback. A confirmative factor analyses was done using the expert’s item clustering, followed by data-driven explorative factor analyses and reliability tests.Results: Experts distributed 74 of the 118 items over all six dimensions of positive health. The confirmatory factor analysis model based on expert classification was not confirmed. The subsequent exploratory factor analysis excluded most items based on factor loading and suggested two factors; ‘quality of life’ and ‘daily functioning’, both showing excellent reliability.Conclusion: The MyQualityOfLife.nl survey can assess the broader concept of health in a population as well as ‘quality of life’ and ‘daily functioning’. However, the survey can currently not evaluate several of the positive health dimensions separately. Further research is needed to determine whether this is due to the instrument or the positive health dimensions.

KW - AUTONOMY

KW - CARE

KW - DEFINING HEALTH

KW - IMPACT

KW - PARTICIPATION

KW - SF-12

KW - Triple Aim

KW - evaluation

KW - population health

KW - positive health

U2 - 10.5334/ijic.3967

DO - 10.5334/ijic.3967

M3 - Article

VL - 19

JO - International Journal of Integrated Care

JF - International Journal of Integrated Care

SN - 1568-4156

IS - 2

M1 - 7

ER -