Measuring the predictability of life outcomes with a scientific mass collaboration

Louis Raes, [No Value] E.a.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

How predictable are life trajectories? We investigated this question with a scientific mass collaboration using the common task method; 160 teams built predictive models for six life outcomes using data from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study, a high-quality birth cohort study. Despite using a rich dataset and applying machine-learning methods optimized for prediction, the best predictions were not very accurate and were only slightly better than those from a simple benchmark model. Within each outcome, prediction error was strongly associated with the family being predicted and weakly associated with the technique used to generate the prediction. Overall, these results suggest practical limits to the predictability of life outcomes in some settings and illustrate the value of mass collaborations in the social sciences.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)8398-8403
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS)
Volume117
Issue number15
Early online date30 Mar 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2020

Keywords

  • Computational Social Science
  • Fragile Families
  • Machine Learning

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring the predictability of life outcomes with a scientific mass collaboration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this