Mechanisms Without Mechanistic Explanation

Naftali Weinberger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

17 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Some recent accounts of constitutive relevance have identified mechanism
components with entities that are causal intermediaries between the input and
output of a mechanism. I argue that on such accounts there is no distinctive interlevel form of mechanistic explanation and that this highlights an absence in the literature of a compelling argument that there are such explanations. Nevertheless, the entities that these accounts call ‘components’ do play an explanatory role. Studying causal intermediaries linking variables X and Y provides knowledge of the counterfactual conditions under which X will continue to bring about Y. This explanatory role does not depend on whether intermediate variables count as components. The question of whether there are distinctively mechanistic
explanations remains open.
Original languageEnglish
JournalSynthese
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2017

Fingerprint

Intermediaries
Causal
Entity
Mechanistic Explanation
Intermediate
literature

Cite this

Weinberger, N. (Accepted/In press). Mechanisms Without Mechanistic Explanation. Synthese.
Weinberger, Naftali. / Mechanisms Without Mechanistic Explanation. In: Synthese. 2017.
@article{ff67fc3a8e6d40d2909ae883d93ef921,
title = "Mechanisms Without Mechanistic Explanation",
abstract = "Some recent accounts of constitutive relevance have identified mechanismcomponents with entities that are causal intermediaries between the input andoutput of a mechanism. I argue that on such accounts there is no distinctive interlevel form of mechanistic explanation and that this highlights an absence in the literature of a compelling argument that there are such explanations. Nevertheless, the entities that these accounts call ‘components’ do play an explanatory role. Studying causal intermediaries linking variables X and Y provides knowledge of the counterfactual conditions under which X will continue to bring about Y. This explanatory role does not depend on whether intermediate variables count as components. The question of whether there are distinctively mechanisticexplanations remains open.",
author = "Naftali Weinberger",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
journal = "Synthese",
issn = "0039-7857",
publisher = "Springer",

}

Mechanisms Without Mechanistic Explanation. / Weinberger, Naftali.

In: Synthese, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mechanisms Without Mechanistic Explanation

AU - Weinberger, Naftali

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Some recent accounts of constitutive relevance have identified mechanismcomponents with entities that are causal intermediaries between the input andoutput of a mechanism. I argue that on such accounts there is no distinctive interlevel form of mechanistic explanation and that this highlights an absence in the literature of a compelling argument that there are such explanations. Nevertheless, the entities that these accounts call ‘components’ do play an explanatory role. Studying causal intermediaries linking variables X and Y provides knowledge of the counterfactual conditions under which X will continue to bring about Y. This explanatory role does not depend on whether intermediate variables count as components. The question of whether there are distinctively mechanisticexplanations remains open.

AB - Some recent accounts of constitutive relevance have identified mechanismcomponents with entities that are causal intermediaries between the input andoutput of a mechanism. I argue that on such accounts there is no distinctive interlevel form of mechanistic explanation and that this highlights an absence in the literature of a compelling argument that there are such explanations. Nevertheless, the entities that these accounts call ‘components’ do play an explanatory role. Studying causal intermediaries linking variables X and Y provides knowledge of the counterfactual conditions under which X will continue to bring about Y. This explanatory role does not depend on whether intermediate variables count as components. The question of whether there are distinctively mechanisticexplanations remains open.

UR - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-017-1538-1

M3 - Article

JO - Synthese

JF - Synthese

SN - 0039-7857

ER -