Meeting patient expectations

Patient expectations and recovery after hip or knee surgery

B.M. Wiering, D. De Boer, D. Delnoij

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

23 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Although patient-centred care could help increase the value of healthcare, practice variations in hip and knee surgery suggest that physicians guide clinical decisions more than patients do. This raises the question whether treatment outcomes still meet patients' expectations. This study investigated whether treatment outcomes measured by patient-reported outcome measures fulfil patients' main expectations (i.e. decreased pain or improved functioning).
Patients who underwent hip or knee surgery in 20 Dutch hospitals in 2014 were invited to a survey consisting of the KOOS Physical Function Short Form or the HOOS Physical Function Short Form, the NRS pain and the EQ-5D. Patients were asked their main reason for surgery and whether the expectations regarding this reason were fulfilled.
A total of 2776 patients completed the survey. The most common reason for surgery was improved functioning (43.7%). Patients who were unable to choose between pain relief and improved functioning and patients who aimed for pain relief experienced more problems before surgery. However, patients who were unable to choose improved more than patients who wanted to improve their functioning on the NRS pain during use and the EQ-5D. More patients who aimed for pain relief felt that their expectations were fulfilled compared to other patients.
Although an expectation for an outcome was not related to a greater improvement on that outcome, patient expectations were an indication of patients' improvement due to surgery. Differences in expectation fulfilment may be due to unrealistic expectations. To achieve optimal value, tailoring treatment using patient preferences and managing patient expectations is vital.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)231–240
JournalMusculoskeletal Surgery
Volume102
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Hip
Knee
Patient Preference
Delivery of Health Care
Physicians

Cite this

Wiering, B.M. ; De Boer, D. ; Delnoij, D. / Meeting patient expectations : Patient expectations and recovery after hip or knee surgery. In: Musculoskeletal Surgery. 2018 ; Vol. 102, No. 3. pp. 231–240.
@article{73a98a08e237413281b511fb6064e806,
title = "Meeting patient expectations: Patient expectations and recovery after hip or knee surgery",
abstract = "Although patient-centred care could help increase the value of healthcare, practice variations in hip and knee surgery suggest that physicians guide clinical decisions more than patients do. This raises the question whether treatment outcomes still meet patients' expectations. This study investigated whether treatment outcomes measured by patient-reported outcome measures fulfil patients' main expectations (i.e. decreased pain or improved functioning).Patients who underwent hip or knee surgery in 20 Dutch hospitals in 2014 were invited to a survey consisting of the KOOS Physical Function Short Form or the HOOS Physical Function Short Form, the NRS pain and the EQ-5D. Patients were asked their main reason for surgery and whether the expectations regarding this reason were fulfilled.A total of 2776 patients completed the survey. The most common reason for surgery was improved functioning (43.7{\%}). Patients who were unable to choose between pain relief and improved functioning and patients who aimed for pain relief experienced more problems before surgery. However, patients who were unable to choose improved more than patients who wanted to improve their functioning on the NRS pain during use and the EQ-5D. More patients who aimed for pain relief felt that their expectations were fulfilled compared to other patients.Although an expectation for an outcome was not related to a greater improvement on that outcome, patient expectations were an indication of patients' improvement due to surgery. Differences in expectation fulfilment may be due to unrealistic expectations. To achieve optimal value, tailoring treatment using patient preferences and managing patient expectations is vital.",
author = "B.M. Wiering and {De Boer}, D. and D. Delnoij",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1007/s12306-017-0523-7",
language = "English",
volume = "102",
pages = "231–240",
journal = "Musculoskeletal Surgery",
issn = "2035-5106",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "3",

}

Meeting patient expectations : Patient expectations and recovery after hip or knee surgery. / Wiering, B.M.; De Boer, D.; Delnoij, D.

In: Musculoskeletal Surgery, Vol. 102, No. 3, 2018, p. 231–240.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Meeting patient expectations

T2 - Patient expectations and recovery after hip or knee surgery

AU - Wiering, B.M.

AU - De Boer, D.

AU - Delnoij, D.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Although patient-centred care could help increase the value of healthcare, practice variations in hip and knee surgery suggest that physicians guide clinical decisions more than patients do. This raises the question whether treatment outcomes still meet patients' expectations. This study investigated whether treatment outcomes measured by patient-reported outcome measures fulfil patients' main expectations (i.e. decreased pain or improved functioning).Patients who underwent hip or knee surgery in 20 Dutch hospitals in 2014 were invited to a survey consisting of the KOOS Physical Function Short Form or the HOOS Physical Function Short Form, the NRS pain and the EQ-5D. Patients were asked their main reason for surgery and whether the expectations regarding this reason were fulfilled.A total of 2776 patients completed the survey. The most common reason for surgery was improved functioning (43.7%). Patients who were unable to choose between pain relief and improved functioning and patients who aimed for pain relief experienced more problems before surgery. However, patients who were unable to choose improved more than patients who wanted to improve their functioning on the NRS pain during use and the EQ-5D. More patients who aimed for pain relief felt that their expectations were fulfilled compared to other patients.Although an expectation for an outcome was not related to a greater improvement on that outcome, patient expectations were an indication of patients' improvement due to surgery. Differences in expectation fulfilment may be due to unrealistic expectations. To achieve optimal value, tailoring treatment using patient preferences and managing patient expectations is vital.

AB - Although patient-centred care could help increase the value of healthcare, practice variations in hip and knee surgery suggest that physicians guide clinical decisions more than patients do. This raises the question whether treatment outcomes still meet patients' expectations. This study investigated whether treatment outcomes measured by patient-reported outcome measures fulfil patients' main expectations (i.e. decreased pain or improved functioning).Patients who underwent hip or knee surgery in 20 Dutch hospitals in 2014 were invited to a survey consisting of the KOOS Physical Function Short Form or the HOOS Physical Function Short Form, the NRS pain and the EQ-5D. Patients were asked their main reason for surgery and whether the expectations regarding this reason were fulfilled.A total of 2776 patients completed the survey. The most common reason for surgery was improved functioning (43.7%). Patients who were unable to choose between pain relief and improved functioning and patients who aimed for pain relief experienced more problems before surgery. However, patients who were unable to choose improved more than patients who wanted to improve their functioning on the NRS pain during use and the EQ-5D. More patients who aimed for pain relief felt that their expectations were fulfilled compared to other patients.Although an expectation for an outcome was not related to a greater improvement on that outcome, patient expectations were an indication of patients' improvement due to surgery. Differences in expectation fulfilment may be due to unrealistic expectations. To achieve optimal value, tailoring treatment using patient preferences and managing patient expectations is vital.

U2 - 10.1007/s12306-017-0523-7

DO - 10.1007/s12306-017-0523-7

M3 - Article

VL - 102

SP - 231

EP - 240

JO - Musculoskeletal Surgery

JF - Musculoskeletal Surgery

SN - 2035-5106

IS - 3

ER -