Microsaccades and preparatory set

a comparison between delayed and immediate, exogenous and endogenous pro- and anti-saccades

Frouke Hermens, Johannes M Zanker, Robin Walker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

When we fixate an object, our eyes are not entirely still, but undergo small displacements such as microsaccades. Here, we investigate whether these microsaccades are sensitive to the preparatory processes involved in programming a saccade. We show that the frequency of microsaccades depends in a specific manner on the intention where to move the eyes (towards a target location or away from it), when to move (immediately after the onset of the target or after a delay), and what type of cue is followed (a peripheral onset or a centrally presented symbolic cue). In particular, in the preparatory interval before and early after target onset, more microsaccades were found when a delayed saccade towards a peripheral target was prepared than when a saccade away was programmed. However, no such difference in the frequency of microsaccades was observed when saccades were initiated immediately after the onset of the target or when the saccades were programmed on the basis of a centrally presented arrow cue. The results are discussed in the context of the neural correlates of response preparation, known as preparatory set.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)489-98
Number of pages10
JournalExperimental Brain Research
Volume201
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cues

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Cognition/physiology
  • Cues
  • Executive Function/physiology
  • Fixation, Ocular/physiology
  • Humans
  • Neural Inhibition/physiology
  • Neuropsychological Tests
  • Photic Stimulation
  • Psychomotor Performance/physiology
  • Reaction Time/physiology
  • Saccades/physiology
  • Time Factors
  • Young Adult

Cite this

@article{6803014c8ca042de82694f21b6441c15,
title = "Microsaccades and preparatory set: a comparison between delayed and immediate, exogenous and endogenous pro- and anti-saccades",
abstract = "When we fixate an object, our eyes are not entirely still, but undergo small displacements such as microsaccades. Here, we investigate whether these microsaccades are sensitive to the preparatory processes involved in programming a saccade. We show that the frequency of microsaccades depends in a specific manner on the intention where to move the eyes (towards a target location or away from it), when to move (immediately after the onset of the target or after a delay), and what type of cue is followed (a peripheral onset or a centrally presented symbolic cue). In particular, in the preparatory interval before and early after target onset, more microsaccades were found when a delayed saccade towards a peripheral target was prepared than when a saccade away was programmed. However, no such difference in the frequency of microsaccades was observed when saccades were initiated immediately after the onset of the target or when the saccades were programmed on the basis of a centrally presented arrow cue. The results are discussed in the context of the neural correlates of response preparation, known as preparatory set.",
keywords = "Adolescent, Adult, Cognition/physiology, Cues, Executive Function/physiology, Fixation, Ocular/physiology, Humans, Neural Inhibition/physiology, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance/physiology, Reaction Time/physiology, Saccades/physiology, Time Factors, Young Adult",
author = "Frouke Hermens and Zanker, {Johannes M} and Robin Walker",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1007/s00221-009-2061-5",
language = "English",
volume = "201",
pages = "489--98",
journal = "Experimental Brain Research",
issn = "0014-4819",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "3",

}

Microsaccades and preparatory set : a comparison between delayed and immediate, exogenous and endogenous pro- and anti-saccades. / Hermens, Frouke; Zanker, Johannes M; Walker, Robin.

In: Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 201, No. 3, 2010, p. 489-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Microsaccades and preparatory set

T2 - a comparison between delayed and immediate, exogenous and endogenous pro- and anti-saccades

AU - Hermens, Frouke

AU - Zanker, Johannes M

AU - Walker, Robin

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - When we fixate an object, our eyes are not entirely still, but undergo small displacements such as microsaccades. Here, we investigate whether these microsaccades are sensitive to the preparatory processes involved in programming a saccade. We show that the frequency of microsaccades depends in a specific manner on the intention where to move the eyes (towards a target location or away from it), when to move (immediately after the onset of the target or after a delay), and what type of cue is followed (a peripheral onset or a centrally presented symbolic cue). In particular, in the preparatory interval before and early after target onset, more microsaccades were found when a delayed saccade towards a peripheral target was prepared than when a saccade away was programmed. However, no such difference in the frequency of microsaccades was observed when saccades were initiated immediately after the onset of the target or when the saccades were programmed on the basis of a centrally presented arrow cue. The results are discussed in the context of the neural correlates of response preparation, known as preparatory set.

AB - When we fixate an object, our eyes are not entirely still, but undergo small displacements such as microsaccades. Here, we investigate whether these microsaccades are sensitive to the preparatory processes involved in programming a saccade. We show that the frequency of microsaccades depends in a specific manner on the intention where to move the eyes (towards a target location or away from it), when to move (immediately after the onset of the target or after a delay), and what type of cue is followed (a peripheral onset or a centrally presented symbolic cue). In particular, in the preparatory interval before and early after target onset, more microsaccades were found when a delayed saccade towards a peripheral target was prepared than when a saccade away was programmed. However, no such difference in the frequency of microsaccades was observed when saccades were initiated immediately after the onset of the target or when the saccades were programmed on the basis of a centrally presented arrow cue. The results are discussed in the context of the neural correlates of response preparation, known as preparatory set.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Adult

KW - Cognition/physiology

KW - Cues

KW - Executive Function/physiology

KW - Fixation, Ocular/physiology

KW - Humans

KW - Neural Inhibition/physiology

KW - Neuropsychological Tests

KW - Photic Stimulation

KW - Psychomotor Performance/physiology

KW - Reaction Time/physiology

KW - Saccades/physiology

KW - Time Factors

KW - Young Adult

U2 - 10.1007/s00221-009-2061-5

DO - 10.1007/s00221-009-2061-5

M3 - Article

VL - 201

SP - 489

EP - 498

JO - Experimental Brain Research

JF - Experimental Brain Research

SN - 0014-4819

IS - 3

ER -