TY - JOUR
T1 - Mind and virtue
T2 - The meaning of learning, a matter of culture?
AU - van Egmond, Marieke C.
AU - Kühnen, Ulrich
AU - Li, Jin
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded by a grant from the German Research Foundation (DFG) to the Bremen International Graduate School of Social Sciences, BIGSSS.
PY - 2013/9
Y1 - 2013/9
N2 - Does the meaning of learning vary across cultures? In order to answer this question we propose a theoretical framework that integrates various reported cultural differences in the domain of learning. Building on the qualitatively derived themes of mind and virtue orientations by Li (2003, 2005), we argue that the Western philosophical tradition has led to a 'mind orientation' in learning, whereas learning beliefs in East-Asia can be characterized as 'virtue oriented'. Characteristic of the Western mind orientation is for learning to be primarily attributed to the cognitive domain. In the virtue orientation, the moral dimension is just as much associated with learning as the cognitive, focusing on the development of the person as a whole. These two orientations are proposed to represent cultural mandates of learning in the respective cultures and are suggested to influence a variety of cultural tasks that can be clustered into four domains. As the review reveals, the purpose, processes, affect and motivation and social perceptions that are associated to the concept of academic learning in Western and East-Asian settings are influenced by equally elaborated cultural traditions and can be meaningfully interpreted in the framework of mind and virtue orientations.
AB - Does the meaning of learning vary across cultures? In order to answer this question we propose a theoretical framework that integrates various reported cultural differences in the domain of learning. Building on the qualitatively derived themes of mind and virtue orientations by Li (2003, 2005), we argue that the Western philosophical tradition has led to a 'mind orientation' in learning, whereas learning beliefs in East-Asia can be characterized as 'virtue oriented'. Characteristic of the Western mind orientation is for learning to be primarily attributed to the cognitive domain. In the virtue orientation, the moral dimension is just as much associated with learning as the cognitive, focusing on the development of the person as a whole. These two orientations are proposed to represent cultural mandates of learning in the respective cultures and are suggested to influence a variety of cultural tasks that can be clustered into four domains. As the review reveals, the purpose, processes, affect and motivation and social perceptions that are associated to the concept of academic learning in Western and East-Asian settings are influenced by equally elaborated cultural traditions and can be meaningfully interpreted in the framework of mind and virtue orientations.
KW - Academic learning
KW - Cultural differences
KW - East-Asian
KW - Western
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881375780&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.lcsi.2013.06.002
DO - 10.1016/j.lcsi.2013.06.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84881375780
SN - 2210-6561
VL - 2
SP - 208
EP - 216
JO - Learning, Culture and Social Interaction
JF - Learning, Culture and Social Interaction
IS - 3
ER -