Mind the gap

A psychometric approach to the reduction problem

R.A. Kievit, J.-W. Romeijn, L.J. Waldorp, J.M. Wicherts, H.S. Scholte, D. Borsboom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Cognitive neuroscience involves the simultaneous analysis of behavioral and neurological data. Common practice in cognitive neuroscience, however, is to limit analyses to the inspection of descriptive measures of association (e.g., correlation coefficients). This practice, often combined with little more than an implicit theoretical stance, fails to address the relationship between neurological and behavioral measures explicitly. This article argues that the reduction problem, in essence, is a measurement problem. As such, it should be solved by using psychometric techniques and models. We show that two influential philosophical theories on this relationship, identity theory and supervenience theory, can be easily translated into psychometric models. Upon such translation, they make explicit hypotheses based on sound theoretical and statistical foundations, which renders them empirically testable. We examine these models, show how they can elucidate our conceptual framework, and examine how they may be used to study foundational questions in cognitive neuroscience. We illustrate these principles by applying them to the relation between personality test scores, intelligence tests, and neurological measures.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67-87
Number of pages21
JournalPsychological Inquiry
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

Kievit, R. A., Romeijn, J-W., Waldorp, L. J., Wicherts, J. M., Scholte, H. S., & Borsboom, D. (2011). Mind the gap: A psychometric approach to the reduction problem. Psychological Inquiry, 22(2), 67-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2011.550181
Kievit, R.A. ; Romeijn, J.-W. ; Waldorp, L.J. ; Wicherts, J.M. ; Scholte, H.S. ; Borsboom, D. / Mind the gap : A psychometric approach to the reduction problem. In: Psychological Inquiry. 2011 ; Vol. 22, No. 2. pp. 67-87.
@article{e291144af7374304bd448da2d1f2cc1e,
title = "Mind the gap: A psychometric approach to the reduction problem",
abstract = "Cognitive neuroscience involves the simultaneous analysis of behavioral and neurological data. Common practice in cognitive neuroscience, however, is to limit analyses to the inspection of descriptive measures of association (e.g., correlation coefficients). This practice, often combined with little more than an implicit theoretical stance, fails to address the relationship between neurological and behavioral measures explicitly. This article argues that the reduction problem, in essence, is a measurement problem. As such, it should be solved by using psychometric techniques and models. We show that two influential philosophical theories on this relationship, identity theory and supervenience theory, can be easily translated into psychometric models. Upon such translation, they make explicit hypotheses based on sound theoretical and statistical foundations, which renders them empirically testable. We examine these models, show how they can elucidate our conceptual framework, and examine how they may be used to study foundational questions in cognitive neuroscience. We illustrate these principles by applying them to the relation between personality test scores, intelligence tests, and neurological measures.",
author = "R.A. Kievit and J.-W. Romeijn and L.J. Waldorp and J.M. Wicherts and H.S. Scholte and D. Borsboom",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1080/1047840X.2011.550181",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "67--87",
journal = "Psychological Inquiry",
issn = "1047-840X",
publisher = "ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD",
number = "2",

}

Kievit, RA, Romeijn, J-W, Waldorp, LJ, Wicherts, JM, Scholte, HS & Borsboom, D 2011, 'Mind the gap: A psychometric approach to the reduction problem', Psychological Inquiry, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 67-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2011.550181

Mind the gap : A psychometric approach to the reduction problem. / Kievit, R.A.; Romeijn, J.-W.; Waldorp, L.J.; Wicherts, J.M.; Scholte, H.S.; Borsboom, D.

In: Psychological Inquiry, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2011, p. 67-87.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mind the gap

T2 - A psychometric approach to the reduction problem

AU - Kievit, R.A.

AU - Romeijn, J.-W.

AU - Waldorp, L.J.

AU - Wicherts, J.M.

AU - Scholte, H.S.

AU - Borsboom, D.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Cognitive neuroscience involves the simultaneous analysis of behavioral and neurological data. Common practice in cognitive neuroscience, however, is to limit analyses to the inspection of descriptive measures of association (e.g., correlation coefficients). This practice, often combined with little more than an implicit theoretical stance, fails to address the relationship between neurological and behavioral measures explicitly. This article argues that the reduction problem, in essence, is a measurement problem. As such, it should be solved by using psychometric techniques and models. We show that two influential philosophical theories on this relationship, identity theory and supervenience theory, can be easily translated into psychometric models. Upon such translation, they make explicit hypotheses based on sound theoretical and statistical foundations, which renders them empirically testable. We examine these models, show how they can elucidate our conceptual framework, and examine how they may be used to study foundational questions in cognitive neuroscience. We illustrate these principles by applying them to the relation between personality test scores, intelligence tests, and neurological measures.

AB - Cognitive neuroscience involves the simultaneous analysis of behavioral and neurological data. Common practice in cognitive neuroscience, however, is to limit analyses to the inspection of descriptive measures of association (e.g., correlation coefficients). This practice, often combined with little more than an implicit theoretical stance, fails to address the relationship between neurological and behavioral measures explicitly. This article argues that the reduction problem, in essence, is a measurement problem. As such, it should be solved by using psychometric techniques and models. We show that two influential philosophical theories on this relationship, identity theory and supervenience theory, can be easily translated into psychometric models. Upon such translation, they make explicit hypotheses based on sound theoretical and statistical foundations, which renders them empirically testable. We examine these models, show how they can elucidate our conceptual framework, and examine how they may be used to study foundational questions in cognitive neuroscience. We illustrate these principles by applying them to the relation between personality test scores, intelligence tests, and neurological measures.

U2 - 10.1080/1047840X.2011.550181

DO - 10.1080/1047840X.2011.550181

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 67

EP - 87

JO - Psychological Inquiry

JF - Psychological Inquiry

SN - 1047-840X

IS - 2

ER -