Moral punishment in everyday life

W. Hofmann*, M.J. Brandt, D.C. Wisneski, B. Rockenbach, L.J. Skitka

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)
283 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The present research investigated event-related, contextual, demographic, and dispositional predictors of the desire to punish perpetrators of immoral deeds in daily life, as well as connections among the desire to punish, moral emotions, and momentary well-being. The desire to punish was reliably predicted by linear gradients of social closeness to both the perpetrator (negative relationship) and the victim (positive relationship). Older rather than younger adults, conservatives rather than people with other political orientations, and individuals high rather than low in moral identity desired to punish perpetrators more harshly. The desire to punish was related to state anger, disgust, and embarrassment, and these were linked to lower momentary well-being. However, the negative effect of these emotions on well-being was partially compensated by a positive indirect pathway via heightened feelings of moral self-worth. Implications of the present field data for moral punishment research and the connection between morality and well-being are discussed.
Keywords: Morality, Moral Punishment, Experience Sampling, Social Closeness
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1697–1711
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume44
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • 3RD-PARTY PUNISHMENT
  • ALTRUISTIC PUNISHMENT
  • BUSINESS ETHICS
  • COSTLY PUNISHMENT
  • DECISION-MAKING
  • MULTILEVEL MEDIATION
  • NORM VIOLATIONS
  • PLANNED BEHAVIOR
  • POLITICAL-IDEOLOGY
  • SOCIAL-CONTROL
  • experience-sampling
  • moral punishment
  • morality
  • social closeness

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Moral punishment in everyday life'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this