Morality in everyday life

W. Hofmann, D.C. Wisneski, M.J. Brandt, L.J. Skitka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The science of morality has drawn heavily on well-controlled but artificial laboratory settings. To study everyday morality, we repeatedly assessed moral or immoral acts and experiences in a large (N = 1252) sample using ecological momentary assessment. Moral experiences were surprisingly frequent and manifold. Liberals and conservatives emphasized somewhat different moral dimensions. Religious and nonreligious participants did not differ in the likelihood or quality of committed moral and immoral acts. Being the target of moral or immoral deeds had the strongest impact on happiness, whereas committing moral or immoral deeds had the strongest impact on sense of purpose. Analyses of daily dynamics revealed evidence for both moral contagion and moral licensing. In sum, morality science may benefit from a closer look at the antecedents, dynamics, and consequences of everyday moral experience.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1340-1343
JournalScience
Volume345
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

morality
everyday life
experience
science
happiness
evidence

Cite this

Hofmann, W., Wisneski, D. C., Brandt, M. J., & Skitka, L. J. (2014). Morality in everyday life. Science, 345, 1340-1343. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251560
Hofmann, W. ; Wisneski, D.C. ; Brandt, M.J. ; Skitka, L.J. / Morality in everyday life. In: Science. 2014 ; Vol. 345. pp. 1340-1343.
@article{f76fb51634ea4b499edbec387c40889a,
title = "Morality in everyday life",
abstract = "The science of morality has drawn heavily on well-controlled but artificial laboratory settings. To study everyday morality, we repeatedly assessed moral or immoral acts and experiences in a large (N = 1252) sample using ecological momentary assessment. Moral experiences were surprisingly frequent and manifold. Liberals and conservatives emphasized somewhat different moral dimensions. Religious and nonreligious participants did not differ in the likelihood or quality of committed moral and immoral acts. Being the target of moral or immoral deeds had the strongest impact on happiness, whereas committing moral or immoral deeds had the strongest impact on sense of purpose. Analyses of daily dynamics revealed evidence for both moral contagion and moral licensing. In sum, morality science may benefit from a closer look at the antecedents, dynamics, and consequences of everyday moral experience.",
author = "W. Hofmann and D.C. Wisneski and M.J. Brandt and L.J. Skitka",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1126/science.1251560",
language = "English",
volume = "345",
pages = "1340--1343",
journal = "Science",
issn = "0036-8075",
publisher = "American Association for the Advancement of Science",

}

Hofmann, W, Wisneski, DC, Brandt, MJ & Skitka, LJ 2014, 'Morality in everyday life', Science, vol. 345, pp. 1340-1343. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251560

Morality in everyday life. / Hofmann, W.; Wisneski, D.C.; Brandt, M.J.; Skitka, L.J.

In: Science, Vol. 345, 2014, p. 1340-1343.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Morality in everyday life

AU - Hofmann, W.

AU - Wisneski, D.C.

AU - Brandt, M.J.

AU - Skitka, L.J.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The science of morality has drawn heavily on well-controlled but artificial laboratory settings. To study everyday morality, we repeatedly assessed moral or immoral acts and experiences in a large (N = 1252) sample using ecological momentary assessment. Moral experiences were surprisingly frequent and manifold. Liberals and conservatives emphasized somewhat different moral dimensions. Religious and nonreligious participants did not differ in the likelihood or quality of committed moral and immoral acts. Being the target of moral or immoral deeds had the strongest impact on happiness, whereas committing moral or immoral deeds had the strongest impact on sense of purpose. Analyses of daily dynamics revealed evidence for both moral contagion and moral licensing. In sum, morality science may benefit from a closer look at the antecedents, dynamics, and consequences of everyday moral experience.

AB - The science of morality has drawn heavily on well-controlled but artificial laboratory settings. To study everyday morality, we repeatedly assessed moral or immoral acts and experiences in a large (N = 1252) sample using ecological momentary assessment. Moral experiences were surprisingly frequent and manifold. Liberals and conservatives emphasized somewhat different moral dimensions. Religious and nonreligious participants did not differ in the likelihood or quality of committed moral and immoral acts. Being the target of moral or immoral deeds had the strongest impact on happiness, whereas committing moral or immoral deeds had the strongest impact on sense of purpose. Analyses of daily dynamics revealed evidence for both moral contagion and moral licensing. In sum, morality science may benefit from a closer look at the antecedents, dynamics, and consequences of everyday moral experience.

U2 - 10.1126/science.1251560

DO - 10.1126/science.1251560

M3 - Article

VL - 345

SP - 1340

EP - 1343

JO - Science

JF - Science

SN - 0036-8075

ER -

Hofmann W, Wisneski DC, Brandt MJ, Skitka LJ. Morality in everyday life. Science. 2014;345:1340-1343. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251560