Much Ado about Little –

Privately Litigated Internet Disconnection Injunctions

Martin Husovec, Miquel Peguera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

In this article we examine the legal framework of the European Union for injunctions against intermediaries whose services are used by a third party to infringe an intellectual property right, as set forth in the InfoSoc Directive and the Enforcement Directive. In particular, we consider the conditions to apply for the injunctions, taking into account how those conditions have been construed by the CJEU. We explore which is the minimum floor of injunctive relief Member States are obliged to provide under the Directives, as well as the maximum ceiling allowed, beyond which the protection granted would infringe upon the limits imposed by EU law. Next, we move on to consider particular types of injunctions that right holders may apply for against intermediaries on the basis of Art. 8(3) of the InfoSoc Directive, namely those that would consist of enjoining an ISP from providing Internet access to one of its users allegedly engaging in copyright infringement. A case already decided in Spain, Promusicae et al. v. R Cable y Telecomunicaciones Galicia, granting such an injunction serves us as a study case to assess the problems these remedies face. On the one hand, these privately litigated Internet disconnection injunctions may be seen by right holders as a promising tool to fight online copyright infringement – perhaps an alternative to unsuccessful graduate response schemes. However, as we show in this article, these injunctions raise serious issues regarding their compatibility with the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. Indeed, the possibility of effective injunctions of this kind which conform with human rights turns out to be very narrow. In other words, the Directive’s provisions promise much, but if applied correctly, they deliver little.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)10-37
Number of pages28
JournalInternational Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law
Volume2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Feb 2015

Fingerprint

Internet
fundamental right
European Law
intellectual property
right of ownership
charter
remedies
human rights
Spain
EU
graduate

Keywords

  • ISP liability
  • injunctions against intermediaries
  • secondary liability
  • internet disconnection injunctions
  • graduated response

Cite this

@article{e66b36d458c441ee8217fa47ff11560f,
title = "Much Ado about Little –: Privately Litigated Internet Disconnection Injunctions",
abstract = "In this article we examine the legal framework of the European Union for injunctions against intermediaries whose services are used by a third party to infringe an intellectual property right, as set forth in the InfoSoc Directive and the Enforcement Directive. In particular, we consider the conditions to apply for the injunctions, taking into account how those conditions have been construed by the CJEU. We explore which is the minimum floor of injunctive relief Member States are obliged to provide under the Directives, as well as the maximum ceiling allowed, beyond which the protection granted would infringe upon the limits imposed by EU law. Next, we move on to consider particular types of injunctions that right holders may apply for against intermediaries on the basis of Art. 8(3) of the InfoSoc Directive, namely those that would consist of enjoining an ISP from providing Internet access to one of its users allegedly engaging in copyright infringement. A case already decided in Spain, Promusicae et al. v. R Cable y Telecomunicaciones Galicia, granting such an injunction serves us as a study case to assess the problems these remedies face. On the one hand, these privately litigated Internet disconnection injunctions may be seen by right holders as a promising tool to fight online copyright infringement – perhaps an alternative to unsuccessful graduate response schemes. However, as we show in this article, these injunctions raise serious issues regarding their compatibility with the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. Indeed, the possibility of effective injunctions of this kind which conform with human rights turns out to be very narrow. In other words, the Directive’s provisions promise much, but if applied correctly, they deliver little.",
keywords = "ISP liability, injunctions against intermediaries, secondary liability, internet disconnection injunctions, graduated response",
author = "Martin Husovec and Miquel Peguera",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "3",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-014-0292-x",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "10--37",
journal = "International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law",
issn = "0018-9855",
publisher = "SPRINGER HEIDELBERG",

}

Much Ado about Little – : Privately Litigated Internet Disconnection Injunctions. / Husovec, Martin; Peguera, Miquel.

In: International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 2, 03.02.2015, p. 10-37.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Much Ado about Little –

T2 - Privately Litigated Internet Disconnection Injunctions

AU - Husovec, Martin

AU - Peguera, Miquel

PY - 2015/2/3

Y1 - 2015/2/3

N2 - In this article we examine the legal framework of the European Union for injunctions against intermediaries whose services are used by a third party to infringe an intellectual property right, as set forth in the InfoSoc Directive and the Enforcement Directive. In particular, we consider the conditions to apply for the injunctions, taking into account how those conditions have been construed by the CJEU. We explore which is the minimum floor of injunctive relief Member States are obliged to provide under the Directives, as well as the maximum ceiling allowed, beyond which the protection granted would infringe upon the limits imposed by EU law. Next, we move on to consider particular types of injunctions that right holders may apply for against intermediaries on the basis of Art. 8(3) of the InfoSoc Directive, namely those that would consist of enjoining an ISP from providing Internet access to one of its users allegedly engaging in copyright infringement. A case already decided in Spain, Promusicae et al. v. R Cable y Telecomunicaciones Galicia, granting such an injunction serves us as a study case to assess the problems these remedies face. On the one hand, these privately litigated Internet disconnection injunctions may be seen by right holders as a promising tool to fight online copyright infringement – perhaps an alternative to unsuccessful graduate response schemes. However, as we show in this article, these injunctions raise serious issues regarding their compatibility with the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. Indeed, the possibility of effective injunctions of this kind which conform with human rights turns out to be very narrow. In other words, the Directive’s provisions promise much, but if applied correctly, they deliver little.

AB - In this article we examine the legal framework of the European Union for injunctions against intermediaries whose services are used by a third party to infringe an intellectual property right, as set forth in the InfoSoc Directive and the Enforcement Directive. In particular, we consider the conditions to apply for the injunctions, taking into account how those conditions have been construed by the CJEU. We explore which is the minimum floor of injunctive relief Member States are obliged to provide under the Directives, as well as the maximum ceiling allowed, beyond which the protection granted would infringe upon the limits imposed by EU law. Next, we move on to consider particular types of injunctions that right holders may apply for against intermediaries on the basis of Art. 8(3) of the InfoSoc Directive, namely those that would consist of enjoining an ISP from providing Internet access to one of its users allegedly engaging in copyright infringement. A case already decided in Spain, Promusicae et al. v. R Cable y Telecomunicaciones Galicia, granting such an injunction serves us as a study case to assess the problems these remedies face. On the one hand, these privately litigated Internet disconnection injunctions may be seen by right holders as a promising tool to fight online copyright infringement – perhaps an alternative to unsuccessful graduate response schemes. However, as we show in this article, these injunctions raise serious issues regarding their compatibility with the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. Indeed, the possibility of effective injunctions of this kind which conform with human rights turns out to be very narrow. In other words, the Directive’s provisions promise much, but if applied correctly, they deliver little.

KW - ISP liability

KW - injunctions against intermediaries

KW - secondary liability

KW - internet disconnection injunctions

KW - graduated response

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-014-0292-x

DO - https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-014-0292-x

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 10

EP - 37

JO - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law

JF - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law

SN - 0018-9855

ER -