Multiple team membership

A demand or resource for employees?

H. Pluut, A.M. Flestea, P.L. Curseu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Multiple team membership as a work design feature is becoming more widespread in modern organizations, with expected positive and negative consequences for individual employees. This study explores whether fragmentation of time across multiple teams is a job demand or a job resource for employees. Drawing on the Job Demands–Resources framework and role theory, we tested a model that relates multiple team membership to a set of job demands (task load, team process load, and conflict with team members) and job resources (team social support and job autonomy). The findings show that multiple team membership increased demands associated with teamwork but not taskwork, while simultaneously reducing social support from team members. In turn, job demands increased job strain, whereas job resources increased work engagement. We conclude that the fragmentation of time across different roles in multiple teams is perceived as a teamwork-related job demand and leads to role strain. The theoretical and practical implications of our findings are further discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)333-348
JournalGroup Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Organizations

Cite this

Pluut, H. ; Flestea, A.M. ; Curseu, P.L. / Multiple team membership : A demand or resource for employees?. In: Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice. 2014 ; Vol. 18, No. 4. pp. 333-348.
@article{f49554820f7445a3ad0b955670e919eb,
title = "Multiple team membership: A demand or resource for employees?",
abstract = "Multiple team membership as a work design feature is becoming more widespread in modern organizations, with expected positive and negative consequences for individual employees. This study explores whether fragmentation of time across multiple teams is a job demand or a job resource for employees. Drawing on the Job Demands–Resources framework and role theory, we tested a model that relates multiple team membership to a set of job demands (task load, team process load, and conflict with team members) and job resources (team social support and job autonomy). The findings show that multiple team membership increased demands associated with teamwork but not taskwork, while simultaneously reducing social support from team members. In turn, job demands increased job strain, whereas job resources increased work engagement. We conclude that the fragmentation of time across different roles in multiple teams is perceived as a teamwork-related job demand and leads to role strain. The theoretical and practical implications of our findings are further discussed.",
author = "H. Pluut and A.M. Flestea and P.L. Curseu",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1037/gdn0000016",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "333--348",
journal = "Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice",
issn = "1089-2699",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "4",

}

Multiple team membership : A demand or resource for employees? / Pluut, H.; Flestea, A.M.; Curseu, P.L.

In: Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2014, p. 333-348.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multiple team membership

T2 - A demand or resource for employees?

AU - Pluut, H.

AU - Flestea, A.M.

AU - Curseu, P.L.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Multiple team membership as a work design feature is becoming more widespread in modern organizations, with expected positive and negative consequences for individual employees. This study explores whether fragmentation of time across multiple teams is a job demand or a job resource for employees. Drawing on the Job Demands–Resources framework and role theory, we tested a model that relates multiple team membership to a set of job demands (task load, team process load, and conflict with team members) and job resources (team social support and job autonomy). The findings show that multiple team membership increased demands associated with teamwork but not taskwork, while simultaneously reducing social support from team members. In turn, job demands increased job strain, whereas job resources increased work engagement. We conclude that the fragmentation of time across different roles in multiple teams is perceived as a teamwork-related job demand and leads to role strain. The theoretical and practical implications of our findings are further discussed.

AB - Multiple team membership as a work design feature is becoming more widespread in modern organizations, with expected positive and negative consequences for individual employees. This study explores whether fragmentation of time across multiple teams is a job demand or a job resource for employees. Drawing on the Job Demands–Resources framework and role theory, we tested a model that relates multiple team membership to a set of job demands (task load, team process load, and conflict with team members) and job resources (team social support and job autonomy). The findings show that multiple team membership increased demands associated with teamwork but not taskwork, while simultaneously reducing social support from team members. In turn, job demands increased job strain, whereas job resources increased work engagement. We conclude that the fragmentation of time across different roles in multiple teams is perceived as a teamwork-related job demand and leads to role strain. The theoretical and practical implications of our findings are further discussed.

U2 - 10.1037/gdn0000016

DO - 10.1037/gdn0000016

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 333

EP - 348

JO - Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice

JF - Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice

SN - 1089-2699

IS - 4

ER -