Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Naming and remembering atypically colored objects: Support for the processing time account for a secondary distinctiveness effect

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionScientificpeer-review

    339 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The secondary distinctiveness effect is the effect that stimuli that are unusual or different from stored knowledge are remembered better than common stimuli. We investigate the processing time explanation for this effect, i.e., that distinctive stimuli receive more attention and thus more processing time during encoding, by combining methodology from object recognition with memory tasks. Participants in our experiment name common and distinctive items (typically and atypically colored objects), and then memory is tested. Our results replicate the secondary distinctiveness effect, as recognition scores are higher for atypically colored objects than for typical ones. Crucially, analyses of response times in the naming task show that atypically colored objects are processed significantly slower than typical ones. We take these findings as providing support for the processing time hypothesis for the secondary distinctiveness effect.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationCogSci 2014
    Subtitle of host publicationCognitive Science Meets Artificial Intelligence: Human and Artificial Agents in Interactive Contexts
    EditorsPaul Bello, Marcello Guarini, Marjorie McShane, Brian Scassellati
    Publication statusPublished - 2014
    EventCogSci 2014 - Québec City, Canada
    Duration: 23 Jul 201426 Jul 2014

    Conference

    ConferenceCogSci 2014
    Country/TerritoryCanada
    CityQuébec City
    Period23/07/1426/07/14

    Keywords

    • memory
    • secondary distinctiveness
    • color
    • processing time
    • object recognition

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Naming and remembering atypically colored objects: Support for the processing time account for a secondary distinctiveness effect'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this