Natural resources and violent conflict

Resource abundance, dependence and the onset of civil wars

C.N. Brunnschweiler, E.H. Bulte

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

In this paper we examine the claim that natural resources invite civil conflict, and challenge the main stylized facts in this literature. We find that the conventional measure of resource dependence is endogenous with respect to conflict, and that instrumenting for dependence implies that it is no longer significant in conflict regressions. Instead, it appears that conflict increases dependence on resource extraction (as a default sector). Moreover,resource abundance is associated with a reduced probability of the onset of war. These results are robust to a range of specifications and, considering the conflict channel, we conclude there is no reason to regard resources as a general curse to peace and development.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)651-674
JournalOxford Economic Papers
Volume61
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Civil war
Natural resources
Resource dependence
Violent conflict
Resources
Channel conflict
Resource extraction
Stylized facts
Peace
Civil conflict

Cite this

@article{ac60826ddce940b79bf8e07bb48ce222,
title = "Natural resources and violent conflict: Resource abundance, dependence and the onset of civil wars",
abstract = "In this paper we examine the claim that natural resources invite civil conflict, and challenge the main stylized facts in this literature. We find that the conventional measure of resource dependence is endogenous with respect to conflict, and that instrumenting for dependence implies that it is no longer significant in conflict regressions. Instead, it appears that conflict increases dependence on resource extraction (as a default sector). Moreover,resource abundance is associated with a reduced probability of the onset of war. These results are robust to a range of specifications and, considering the conflict channel, we conclude there is no reason to regard resources as a general curse to peace and development.",
author = "C.N. Brunnschweiler and E.H. Bulte",
year = "2009",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "651--674",
journal = "Oxford Economic Papers",
issn = "0030-7653",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

Natural resources and violent conflict : Resource abundance, dependence and the onset of civil wars. / Brunnschweiler, C.N.; Bulte, E.H.

In: Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 61, No. 4, 2009, p. 651-674.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Natural resources and violent conflict

T2 - Resource abundance, dependence and the onset of civil wars

AU - Brunnschweiler, C.N.

AU - Bulte, E.H.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - In this paper we examine the claim that natural resources invite civil conflict, and challenge the main stylized facts in this literature. We find that the conventional measure of resource dependence is endogenous with respect to conflict, and that instrumenting for dependence implies that it is no longer significant in conflict regressions. Instead, it appears that conflict increases dependence on resource extraction (as a default sector). Moreover,resource abundance is associated with a reduced probability of the onset of war. These results are robust to a range of specifications and, considering the conflict channel, we conclude there is no reason to regard resources as a general curse to peace and development.

AB - In this paper we examine the claim that natural resources invite civil conflict, and challenge the main stylized facts in this literature. We find that the conventional measure of resource dependence is endogenous with respect to conflict, and that instrumenting for dependence implies that it is no longer significant in conflict regressions. Instead, it appears that conflict increases dependence on resource extraction (as a default sector). Moreover,resource abundance is associated with a reduced probability of the onset of war. These results are robust to a range of specifications and, considering the conflict channel, we conclude there is no reason to regard resources as a general curse to peace and development.

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 651

EP - 674

JO - Oxford Economic Papers

JF - Oxford Economic Papers

SN - 0030-7653

IS - 4

ER -