Neoliberalism and work-related risks: Individual or collective responsibilization?

P. Mascini*, P. Achterberg, D. Houtman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Based on a representative sample of the Dutch population (N=2467), we test four hypotheses about how utilitarian individualism influences the responsibilization of work-related risks (i.e. the risk of dropping out of work because of unemployment, disability, or sickness). The risk society hypothesis understands utilitarian individualism as a laissez-faire ideological orientation and assumes it to lead to individual responsibilization. The blame culture hypothesis conceives utilitarian individualists as consumer citizens and predicts the reverse - that those concerned expect to be protected by the government. The resentment hypothesis assumes that particularly utilitarian individualists with a vulnerable labor-market position individualize responsibility, because they distrust those who share their fate more than others do. The narcissism hypothesis reverses this logic, because it assumes that utilitarian individualists' narcissistic self-centeredness entices them to make others responsible for their own risks. The two hypotheses predicting an individualization of work-related risk due to utilitarian individualism are both confirmed, whereas the two hypotheses predicting it to result in their collectivization are both rejected.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1209-1224
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Risk Research
Volume16
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • culture of blame
  • utilitarian individualism
  • work-related risks
  • CULTURE
  • SOCIETY
  • INSECURITY
  • SAFETY
  • HEALTH

Cite this

@article{aee8e5e5e7c04452a9627dd2b00a25ad,
title = "Neoliberalism and work-related risks: Individual or collective responsibilization?",
abstract = "Based on a representative sample of the Dutch population (N=2467), we test four hypotheses about how utilitarian individualism influences the responsibilization of work-related risks (i.e. the risk of dropping out of work because of unemployment, disability, or sickness). The risk society hypothesis understands utilitarian individualism as a laissez-faire ideological orientation and assumes it to lead to individual responsibilization. The blame culture hypothesis conceives utilitarian individualists as consumer citizens and predicts the reverse - that those concerned expect to be protected by the government. The resentment hypothesis assumes that particularly utilitarian individualists with a vulnerable labor-market position individualize responsibility, because they distrust those who share their fate more than others do. The narcissism hypothesis reverses this logic, because it assumes that utilitarian individualists' narcissistic self-centeredness entices them to make others responsible for their own risks. The two hypotheses predicting an individualization of work-related risk due to utilitarian individualism are both confirmed, whereas the two hypotheses predicting it to result in their collectivization are both rejected.",
keywords = "culture of blame, utilitarian individualism, work-related risks, CULTURE, SOCIETY, INSECURITY, SAFETY, HEALTH",
author = "P. Mascini and P. Achterberg and D. Houtman",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/13669877.2012.761274",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "1209--1224",
journal = "Journal of Risk Research",
issn = "1366-9877",
publisher = "ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD",
number = "10",

}

Neoliberalism and work-related risks : Individual or collective responsibilization? / Mascini, P.; Achterberg, P.; Houtman, D.

In: Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 16, No. 10, 01.11.2013, p. 1209-1224.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neoliberalism and work-related risks

T2 - Individual or collective responsibilization?

AU - Mascini, P.

AU - Achterberg, P.

AU - Houtman, D.

PY - 2013/11/1

Y1 - 2013/11/1

N2 - Based on a representative sample of the Dutch population (N=2467), we test four hypotheses about how utilitarian individualism influences the responsibilization of work-related risks (i.e. the risk of dropping out of work because of unemployment, disability, or sickness). The risk society hypothesis understands utilitarian individualism as a laissez-faire ideological orientation and assumes it to lead to individual responsibilization. The blame culture hypothesis conceives utilitarian individualists as consumer citizens and predicts the reverse - that those concerned expect to be protected by the government. The resentment hypothesis assumes that particularly utilitarian individualists with a vulnerable labor-market position individualize responsibility, because they distrust those who share their fate more than others do. The narcissism hypothesis reverses this logic, because it assumes that utilitarian individualists' narcissistic self-centeredness entices them to make others responsible for their own risks. The two hypotheses predicting an individualization of work-related risk due to utilitarian individualism are both confirmed, whereas the two hypotheses predicting it to result in their collectivization are both rejected.

AB - Based on a representative sample of the Dutch population (N=2467), we test four hypotheses about how utilitarian individualism influences the responsibilization of work-related risks (i.e. the risk of dropping out of work because of unemployment, disability, or sickness). The risk society hypothesis understands utilitarian individualism as a laissez-faire ideological orientation and assumes it to lead to individual responsibilization. The blame culture hypothesis conceives utilitarian individualists as consumer citizens and predicts the reverse - that those concerned expect to be protected by the government. The resentment hypothesis assumes that particularly utilitarian individualists with a vulnerable labor-market position individualize responsibility, because they distrust those who share their fate more than others do. The narcissism hypothesis reverses this logic, because it assumes that utilitarian individualists' narcissistic self-centeredness entices them to make others responsible for their own risks. The two hypotheses predicting an individualization of work-related risk due to utilitarian individualism are both confirmed, whereas the two hypotheses predicting it to result in their collectivization are both rejected.

KW - culture of blame

KW - utilitarian individualism

KW - work-related risks

KW - CULTURE

KW - SOCIETY

KW - INSECURITY

KW - SAFETY

KW - HEALTH

U2 - 10.1080/13669877.2012.761274

DO - 10.1080/13669877.2012.761274

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 1209

EP - 1224

JO - Journal of Risk Research

JF - Journal of Risk Research

SN - 1366-9877

IS - 10

ER -