Projects per year
The research questions of this chapter are:
– Do the 2009 changes in the Dutch national tax law in respect of the exit taxation of annuities and pension claims constitute tax treaty override?
– Should these 2009 changes be considered to constitute tax treaty override?
In 2009, the Dutch legislature changed the national tax law systems in respect of the exit taxation on annuities and pensions. The questions are whether the inclusion of these rules constitutes or should be considered to constitute tax treaty override in respect of tax treaties concluded before 2009. Since a significant number of countries have included an exit taxation clause in various fields in their national laws, the answers to these questions may not only be relevant for the Netherlands, but may have a wider impact. Therefore, the answers provided by the Dutch Supreme Court may, both from an academic and practical point of view, contribute to the learning processes in other states. In this context, in this chapter, the author will discuss a recent ruling of the Dutch Supreme Court: HR, 14 July 2017, no. 17/01256, BNB 2017/186. The most important question in this case was whether the changes in the Dutch domestic tax legislation had to be considered an act of tax treaty override in the context of the France-Netherlands Income and Capital Tax Treaty (1973).
In order to answer the research questions, this contribution adheres to a traditional legal methodology. In the context of interpreting and applying tax treaties, the principle of good faith is a main principle of international taxation. This methodology makes it possible to acquire a more complete understanding of the possible impact of the interpretation and application of tax treaties as done by the Dutch Supreme Court. For the descriptions, analyses and evaluations, the author has used sources of law, including national tax law, (tax) treaties (including the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties – VCLT, and the respective OECD Models), global issues (e.g. global principles in redistributive justice), legislative history, technical explanations, case law, statements of practice, public rulings, private rulings and literature.
Firstly, the facts of the case are briefly described. Secondly, the decision of the Dutch Supreme Court is presented. Subsequently, the decision is analysed and evaluated. The author has developed a benchmark to assess the Supreme Court’s decision and to come up with suggestions for improvement if necessary. The author explains that a tax treaty should be interpreted and applied consistently with the principle of good faith (legal certainty). In this context, the author also addresses the impact that the decision may have on the tax treaty negotiation process and tax treaties themselves if a contracting state wants to safeguard better the prevention of tax treaty override. The author closes with the main conclusions.
|Title of host publication||Tax Treaty Case Law Around the Globe 2018|
|Editors||Eric C.C.M. Kemmeren, Peter Essers, Daniël S. Smit, Cihat Öner, Michael Lang, Jeffrey Owens, Pasquale Pistone, Alexander Rust, Josef Schuch, Claus Staringer, Alfred Storck|
|Place of Publication||Amsterdam/Vienna|
|Number of pages||27|
|ISBN (Electronic)||9789087225353, 9783709410073, 9789087225360, 9783709408612|
|ISBN (Print)||9789087225346 , 9783707340228|
|Publication status||Published - 2019|
|Event||Tax Treaty Case Law around the Globe 2018 - Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands|
Duration: 24 May 2018 → 26 May 2018
|Name||Series on International Tax Law|
|Conference||Tax Treaty Case Law around the Globe 2018|
|Period||24/05/18 → 26/05/18|
- Tax treaties, tax treaty override, exit taxes, annuities, pensions
FingerprintDive into the research topics of 'Netherlands: unilateral changes in exit taxation of annuities and pensions: Tax treaty override?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
- 1 Active
Bekker, S., Bomer, A., Borghouts, I., De Pietro, C., Dusarduijn, S., Elsweier, F., Essers, P., Garcia Anton, R., Gribnau, H., Gubbels, N., Hoogeveen, M., Houwerzijl, M., Kaufmann, W., Kemmeren, E., Lafarre, A., Lejour, A., Li, J., Loth, M., Mc Cahery, J., Montebovi, S., Peters, C., Rombouts, B., Russo, R., Staats, G., Starink, B., Steegmans, M., Stevens, S., Stevens, T., Sumner, I., Tjong Tjin Tai, E., Tzankova, I., Verbruggen, P., Vermeulen, E., Westerhout, E., Weterings, W., Wibier, R., Xu, D., Zegveld, C., Zekić, N., van Gulijk, S., van Hout, D., van Hulten, M., van Kempen, T., van Kesteren, H., van Vijfeijken, I., van der Elst, C., van der Sangen, G., Öner, C., Kryla-Cudna, K., Mak, V., Smit, D., Op Heij, D., Onţanu, E. A., Salah, O., Wijntjens, L., van Norden, G., van den Bosch, S., Fernandez de Aranguiz Chueca, A., Diamant, Y., Geiregat, S., van der Burgt, B., Hofman, A. & Groeneveld-Tijssens, N.
1/01/19 → 31/12/24
Project: Research project