Neural Representationalism, the Hard Problem of Content, and Vitiated Verdicts: A Reply To Hutto & Myin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)257-274
Number of pages18
JournalPhenomenology and the cognitive sciences
Volume13
Early online date8 Feb 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Cite this

@article{61303856b0664acaae9ec8701247092c,
title = "Neural Representationalism, the Hard Problem of Content, and Vitiated Verdicts: A Reply To Hutto & Myin",
author = "M. Colombo",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s11097-014-9350-6",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "257--274",
journal = "Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences",
issn = "1572-8676",
publisher = "Springer",

}

Neural Representationalism, the Hard Problem of Content, and Vitiated Verdicts : A Reply To Hutto & Myin. / Colombo, M.

In: Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences, Vol. 13, 2014, p. 257-274.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neural Representationalism, the Hard Problem of Content, and Vitiated Verdicts

T2 - A Reply To Hutto & Myin

AU - Colombo, M.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

U2 - 10.1007/s11097-014-9350-6

DO - 10.1007/s11097-014-9350-6

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 257

EP - 274

JO - Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences

JF - Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences

SN - 1572-8676

ER -