Neurobiological regret and rejoice functions for aversive outcomes

P.V.S. Chandrasekhar, C.M. Capra, S. Moore, C.N. Noussair, G. Berns

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

A decision maker may experience regret when a choice he makes results in a more adverse outcome than a different choice would have yielded. Analogously, he may experience rejoice when his choice resulted in better outcomes. We used fMRI to investigate the neural correlates of regret and rejoice where payoffs are in terms of a non-monetary medium. Incentives were created using painful outcomes in the form of mild electrical shocks to the foot and the possibility of avoiding them. We hypothesized that the neural response to a painful outcome resulting from an individual’s choice would also reflect the degree of regret as measured by the likelihood that alternative choices would have yielded the same adverse outcome. Similarly, when an individual avoids a potential shock, he would experience a degree of rejoice that correlates with the probability he had of receiving the shock. For example, winning a bet when winning was unlikely, even if the outcome is the same, evokes more rejoice than winning when it was highly probable. Our results suggest that activation of a cortical network, consisting of the medial orbitofrontal cortex, left superior frontal cortex, right angular gyrus, and left thalamus, correlates with the degree of regret. A different network, including the rostral anterior cingulate, left hippocampus, left ventral striatum, and brainstem/midbrain correlated with rejoice. The right inferior orbitofrontal cortex, pre-supplementary motor area, anterior cingulate, and posterior cingulate showed similar patterns of activation with both regret and rejoice, suggesting that these regions may be associated with surprise from the realization of relatively unlikely events. Our results suggest that distinct, but overlapping networks are involved in the experiences of regret and rejoice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1472-1484
JournalNeuroimage
Volume39
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Gyrus Cinguli
Motor Cortex

Cite this

Chandrasekhar, P. V. S., Capra, C. M., Moore, S., Noussair, C. N., & Berns, G. (2008). Neurobiological regret and rejoice functions for aversive outcomes. Neuroimage, 39(3), 1472-1484.
Chandrasekhar, P.V.S. ; Capra, C.M. ; Moore, S. ; Noussair, C.N. ; Berns, G. / Neurobiological regret and rejoice functions for aversive outcomes. In: Neuroimage. 2008 ; Vol. 39, No. 3. pp. 1472-1484.
@article{8dc80fc278b948e395153c7de2164bd2,
title = "Neurobiological regret and rejoice functions for aversive outcomes",
abstract = "A decision maker may experience regret when a choice he makes results in a more adverse outcome than a different choice would have yielded. Analogously, he may experience rejoice when his choice resulted in better outcomes. We used fMRI to investigate the neural correlates of regret and rejoice where payoffs are in terms of a non-monetary medium. Incentives were created using painful outcomes in the form of mild electrical shocks to the foot and the possibility of avoiding them. We hypothesized that the neural response to a painful outcome resulting from an individual’s choice would also reflect the degree of regret as measured by the likelihood that alternative choices would have yielded the same adverse outcome. Similarly, when an individual avoids a potential shock, he would experience a degree of rejoice that correlates with the probability he had of receiving the shock. For example, winning a bet when winning was unlikely, even if the outcome is the same, evokes more rejoice than winning when it was highly probable. Our results suggest that activation of a cortical network, consisting of the medial orbitofrontal cortex, left superior frontal cortex, right angular gyrus, and left thalamus, correlates with the degree of regret. A different network, including the rostral anterior cingulate, left hippocampus, left ventral striatum, and brainstem/midbrain correlated with rejoice. The right inferior orbitofrontal cortex, pre-supplementary motor area, anterior cingulate, and posterior cingulate showed similar patterns of activation with both regret and rejoice, suggesting that these regions may be associated with surprise from the realization of relatively unlikely events. Our results suggest that distinct, but overlapping networks are involved in the experiences of regret and rejoice.",
author = "P.V.S. Chandrasekhar and C.M. Capra and S. Moore and C.N. Noussair and G. Berns",
year = "2008",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "1472--1484",
journal = "Neuroimage",
issn = "1053-8119",
publisher = "ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE",
number = "3",

}

Chandrasekhar, PVS, Capra, CM, Moore, S, Noussair, CN & Berns, G 2008, 'Neurobiological regret and rejoice functions for aversive outcomes', Neuroimage, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 1472-1484.

Neurobiological regret and rejoice functions for aversive outcomes. / Chandrasekhar, P.V.S.; Capra, C.M.; Moore, S.; Noussair, C.N.; Berns, G.

In: Neuroimage, Vol. 39, No. 3, 2008, p. 1472-1484.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neurobiological regret and rejoice functions for aversive outcomes

AU - Chandrasekhar, P.V.S.

AU - Capra, C.M.

AU - Moore, S.

AU - Noussair, C.N.

AU - Berns, G.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - A decision maker may experience regret when a choice he makes results in a more adverse outcome than a different choice would have yielded. Analogously, he may experience rejoice when his choice resulted in better outcomes. We used fMRI to investigate the neural correlates of regret and rejoice where payoffs are in terms of a non-monetary medium. Incentives were created using painful outcomes in the form of mild electrical shocks to the foot and the possibility of avoiding them. We hypothesized that the neural response to a painful outcome resulting from an individual’s choice would also reflect the degree of regret as measured by the likelihood that alternative choices would have yielded the same adverse outcome. Similarly, when an individual avoids a potential shock, he would experience a degree of rejoice that correlates with the probability he had of receiving the shock. For example, winning a bet when winning was unlikely, even if the outcome is the same, evokes more rejoice than winning when it was highly probable. Our results suggest that activation of a cortical network, consisting of the medial orbitofrontal cortex, left superior frontal cortex, right angular gyrus, and left thalamus, correlates with the degree of regret. A different network, including the rostral anterior cingulate, left hippocampus, left ventral striatum, and brainstem/midbrain correlated with rejoice. The right inferior orbitofrontal cortex, pre-supplementary motor area, anterior cingulate, and posterior cingulate showed similar patterns of activation with both regret and rejoice, suggesting that these regions may be associated with surprise from the realization of relatively unlikely events. Our results suggest that distinct, but overlapping networks are involved in the experiences of regret and rejoice.

AB - A decision maker may experience regret when a choice he makes results in a more adverse outcome than a different choice would have yielded. Analogously, he may experience rejoice when his choice resulted in better outcomes. We used fMRI to investigate the neural correlates of regret and rejoice where payoffs are in terms of a non-monetary medium. Incentives were created using painful outcomes in the form of mild electrical shocks to the foot and the possibility of avoiding them. We hypothesized that the neural response to a painful outcome resulting from an individual’s choice would also reflect the degree of regret as measured by the likelihood that alternative choices would have yielded the same adverse outcome. Similarly, when an individual avoids a potential shock, he would experience a degree of rejoice that correlates with the probability he had of receiving the shock. For example, winning a bet when winning was unlikely, even if the outcome is the same, evokes more rejoice than winning when it was highly probable. Our results suggest that activation of a cortical network, consisting of the medial orbitofrontal cortex, left superior frontal cortex, right angular gyrus, and left thalamus, correlates with the degree of regret. A different network, including the rostral anterior cingulate, left hippocampus, left ventral striatum, and brainstem/midbrain correlated with rejoice. The right inferior orbitofrontal cortex, pre-supplementary motor area, anterior cingulate, and posterior cingulate showed similar patterns of activation with both regret and rejoice, suggesting that these regions may be associated with surprise from the realization of relatively unlikely events. Our results suggest that distinct, but overlapping networks are involved in the experiences of regret and rejoice.

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 1472

EP - 1484

JO - Neuroimage

JF - Neuroimage

SN - 1053-8119

IS - 3

ER -

Chandrasekhar PVS, Capra CM, Moore S, Noussair CN, Berns G. Neurobiological regret and rejoice functions for aversive outcomes. Neuroimage. 2008;39(3):1472-1484.