Abstract
Recently, Xhignesse has argued that the principle of poetic licence (PPL), which roughly states that any class of propositions is true in some possible fiction, ought to be rejected. Here, we defend PPL from Xhignesse’s objection by demonstrating that, properly understood, his purported counter-example case is either irrelevant or unproblematic. The upshot is that Xhignesse has given us no reason to reject PPL.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 319-326 |
Journal | British Journal of Aesthetics |
Volume | 58 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 7 Sept 2018 |