Abstract
A common approach in the philosophy of love defines love as caring about one another and promoting one another's interests, aims and values. The view faces several problems and has been re-formulated to avoid them. However, here I argue that a larger re-formulation of the definition of love is needed in order to accommodate three instances of what I call 'non-harmonious' relationships. I identify three types of non-harmonious love (featuring problematic interests, opposing interests and neutral interests the lovers do not care about) and ultimately claim that our definition of love must incorporate conflict and self-interest, and we should then abandon the excessive focus on the sharing of values.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 276-297 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | International Journal of Philosophical Studies |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 27 May 2022 |
Keywords
- Philosophy of love
- Definition of love
- Love