Non-take-up of Tax-favored Savings Plans

Are Household Portfolios Optimal?

R.J.M. Alessie, S. Hochgürtel, A.H.O. van Soest

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

208 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Since the early nineties, the Dutch tax system allows for a tax-favored form of risk free savings through employer-sponsored savings plans (ESSPs).Under some conditions and up to a certain amount, the contributions to this plan are tax-deductible, and the returns as well as the withdrawals are tax-free.This makes these plans extremely attractive, with real after-tax returns by far exceeding the returns to other financial assets such as risk free saving accounts or stocks and bonds.It suggests that those who have access to this type of savings should participate in them, provided they have some financial wealth that they can allocate to their own choice.Moreover, unless liquid financial wealth is too small, each household should hold the maximum amount to which the tax incentives apply.In this paper, we analyze household data on participation in ESSPs.For those who have access to the asset, we investigate the relationship between the ownership decision, the amount held, substitution of other savings, and background characteristics.We find that people who are likely to face binding liquidity constraints less often buy ESSPs and, if they buy them, more often use them as a substitute for other savings.Regular smokers often do not hold ESSPs, suggesting that some people in this group do not compose their portfolios optimally.The results question the assumption of rational financial decision making, which is typically maintained in theoretical as well as empirical work on savings and portfolio choice.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherEconometrics
Number of pages22
Volume2001-71
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Publication series

NameCentER Discussion Paper
Volume2001-71

Fingerprint

Tax
Household portfolios
Savings
Employers
Financial wealth
Household
Tax system
Ownership
Financial decision making
Participation
Tax incentives
Substitution
Substitute
Assets
Liquidity constraints
Deductibles
Portfolio choice
Financial assets

Keywords

  • savings
  • taxation
  • household economics

Cite this

Alessie, R. J. M., Hochgürtel, S., & van Soest, A. H. O. (2001). Non-take-up of Tax-favored Savings Plans: Are Household Portfolios Optimal? (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2001-71). Tilburg: Econometrics.
Alessie, R.J.M. ; Hochgürtel, S. ; van Soest, A.H.O. / Non-take-up of Tax-favored Savings Plans : Are Household Portfolios Optimal?. Tilburg : Econometrics, 2001. (CentER Discussion Paper).
@techreport{c86518a6ed504765969e1a1057a4256e,
title = "Non-take-up of Tax-favored Savings Plans: Are Household Portfolios Optimal?",
abstract = "Since the early nineties, the Dutch tax system allows for a tax-favored form of risk free savings through employer-sponsored savings plans (ESSPs).Under some conditions and up to a certain amount, the contributions to this plan are tax-deductible, and the returns as well as the withdrawals are tax-free.This makes these plans extremely attractive, with real after-tax returns by far exceeding the returns to other financial assets such as risk free saving accounts or stocks and bonds.It suggests that those who have access to this type of savings should participate in them, provided they have some financial wealth that they can allocate to their own choice.Moreover, unless liquid financial wealth is too small, each household should hold the maximum amount to which the tax incentives apply.In this paper, we analyze household data on participation in ESSPs.For those who have access to the asset, we investigate the relationship between the ownership decision, the amount held, substitution of other savings, and background characteristics.We find that people who are likely to face binding liquidity constraints less often buy ESSPs and, if they buy them, more often use them as a substitute for other savings.Regular smokers often do not hold ESSPs, suggesting that some people in this group do not compose their portfolios optimally.The results question the assumption of rational financial decision making, which is typically maintained in theoretical as well as empirical work on savings and portfolio choice.",
keywords = "savings, taxation, household economics",
author = "R.J.M. Alessie and S. Hochg{\"u}rtel and {van Soest}, A.H.O.",
note = "Pagination: 22",
year = "2001",
language = "English",
volume = "2001-71",
series = "CentER Discussion Paper",
publisher = "Econometrics",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Econometrics",

}

Alessie, RJM, Hochgürtel, S & van Soest, AHO 2001 'Non-take-up of Tax-favored Savings Plans: Are Household Portfolios Optimal?' CentER Discussion Paper, vol. 2001-71, Econometrics, Tilburg.

Non-take-up of Tax-favored Savings Plans : Are Household Portfolios Optimal? / Alessie, R.J.M.; Hochgürtel, S.; van Soest, A.H.O.

Tilburg : Econometrics, 2001. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2001-71).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - Non-take-up of Tax-favored Savings Plans

T2 - Are Household Portfolios Optimal?

AU - Alessie, R.J.M.

AU - Hochgürtel, S.

AU - van Soest, A.H.O.

N1 - Pagination: 22

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Since the early nineties, the Dutch tax system allows for a tax-favored form of risk free savings through employer-sponsored savings plans (ESSPs).Under some conditions and up to a certain amount, the contributions to this plan are tax-deductible, and the returns as well as the withdrawals are tax-free.This makes these plans extremely attractive, with real after-tax returns by far exceeding the returns to other financial assets such as risk free saving accounts or stocks and bonds.It suggests that those who have access to this type of savings should participate in them, provided they have some financial wealth that they can allocate to their own choice.Moreover, unless liquid financial wealth is too small, each household should hold the maximum amount to which the tax incentives apply.In this paper, we analyze household data on participation in ESSPs.For those who have access to the asset, we investigate the relationship between the ownership decision, the amount held, substitution of other savings, and background characteristics.We find that people who are likely to face binding liquidity constraints less often buy ESSPs and, if they buy them, more often use them as a substitute for other savings.Regular smokers often do not hold ESSPs, suggesting that some people in this group do not compose their portfolios optimally.The results question the assumption of rational financial decision making, which is typically maintained in theoretical as well as empirical work on savings and portfolio choice.

AB - Since the early nineties, the Dutch tax system allows for a tax-favored form of risk free savings through employer-sponsored savings plans (ESSPs).Under some conditions and up to a certain amount, the contributions to this plan are tax-deductible, and the returns as well as the withdrawals are tax-free.This makes these plans extremely attractive, with real after-tax returns by far exceeding the returns to other financial assets such as risk free saving accounts or stocks and bonds.It suggests that those who have access to this type of savings should participate in them, provided they have some financial wealth that they can allocate to their own choice.Moreover, unless liquid financial wealth is too small, each household should hold the maximum amount to which the tax incentives apply.In this paper, we analyze household data on participation in ESSPs.For those who have access to the asset, we investigate the relationship between the ownership decision, the amount held, substitution of other savings, and background characteristics.We find that people who are likely to face binding liquidity constraints less often buy ESSPs and, if they buy them, more often use them as a substitute for other savings.Regular smokers often do not hold ESSPs, suggesting that some people in this group do not compose their portfolios optimally.The results question the assumption of rational financial decision making, which is typically maintained in theoretical as well as empirical work on savings and portfolio choice.

KW - savings

KW - taxation

KW - household economics

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 2001-71

T3 - CentER Discussion Paper

BT - Non-take-up of Tax-favored Savings Plans

PB - Econometrics

CY - Tilburg

ER -

Alessie RJM, Hochgürtel S, van Soest AHO. Non-take-up of Tax-favored Savings Plans: Are Household Portfolios Optimal? Tilburg: Econometrics. 2001. (CentER Discussion Paper).