Nonlinear neurobiological probability weighting functions for aversive outcomes

G. Berns, C.M. Capra, J. Chappelow, S. Moore, C.N. Noussair

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

While mainstream economic models assume that individuals treat probabilities objectively, many people tend to overestimate the likelihood of improbable events and underestimate the likelihood of probable events. However, a biological account for why probabilities would be treated this way does not yet exist. While undergoing fMRI, we presented individuals with a series of lotteries, defined by the voltage of an impending cutaneous electric shock and the probability with which the shock would be received. During the prospect phase, neural activity that tracked the probability of the expected outcome was observed in a circumscribed network of brain regions that included the anterior cingulate, visual, parietal, and temporal cortices. Most of these regions displayed responses to probabilities consistent with nonlinear probability weighting. The neural responses to passive lotteries predicted 79% of subsequent decisions when individuals were offered choices between different lotteries, and exceeded that predicted by behavior alone near the indifference point.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2047-2057
JournalNeuroimage
Volume39
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Economic Models
Gyrus Cinguli
Visual Cortex

Cite this

Berns, G., Capra, C. M., Chappelow, J., Moore, S., & Noussair, C. N. (2008). Nonlinear neurobiological probability weighting functions for aversive outcomes. Neuroimage, 39(4), 2047-2057.
Berns, G. ; Capra, C.M. ; Chappelow, J. ; Moore, S. ; Noussair, C.N. / Nonlinear neurobiological probability weighting functions for aversive outcomes. In: Neuroimage. 2008 ; Vol. 39, No. 4. pp. 2047-2057.
@article{9711390c43d345edb08e869fc85ea630,
title = "Nonlinear neurobiological probability weighting functions for aversive outcomes",
abstract = "While mainstream economic models assume that individuals treat probabilities objectively, many people tend to overestimate the likelihood of improbable events and underestimate the likelihood of probable events. However, a biological account for why probabilities would be treated this way does not yet exist. While undergoing fMRI, we presented individuals with a series of lotteries, defined by the voltage of an impending cutaneous electric shock and the probability with which the shock would be received. During the prospect phase, neural activity that tracked the probability of the expected outcome was observed in a circumscribed network of brain regions that included the anterior cingulate, visual, parietal, and temporal cortices. Most of these regions displayed responses to probabilities consistent with nonlinear probability weighting. The neural responses to passive lotteries predicted 79{\%} of subsequent decisions when individuals were offered choices between different lotteries, and exceeded that predicted by behavior alone near the indifference point.",
author = "G. Berns and C.M. Capra and J. Chappelow and S. Moore and C.N. Noussair",
year = "2008",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "2047--2057",
journal = "Neuroimage",
issn = "1053-8119",
publisher = "ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE",
number = "4",

}

Berns, G, Capra, CM, Chappelow, J, Moore, S & Noussair, CN 2008, 'Nonlinear neurobiological probability weighting functions for aversive outcomes', Neuroimage, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 2047-2057.

Nonlinear neurobiological probability weighting functions for aversive outcomes. / Berns, G.; Capra, C.M.; Chappelow, J.; Moore, S.; Noussair, C.N.

In: Neuroimage, Vol. 39, No. 4, 2008, p. 2047-2057.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nonlinear neurobiological probability weighting functions for aversive outcomes

AU - Berns, G.

AU - Capra, C.M.

AU - Chappelow, J.

AU - Moore, S.

AU - Noussair, C.N.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - While mainstream economic models assume that individuals treat probabilities objectively, many people tend to overestimate the likelihood of improbable events and underestimate the likelihood of probable events. However, a biological account for why probabilities would be treated this way does not yet exist. While undergoing fMRI, we presented individuals with a series of lotteries, defined by the voltage of an impending cutaneous electric shock and the probability with which the shock would be received. During the prospect phase, neural activity that tracked the probability of the expected outcome was observed in a circumscribed network of brain regions that included the anterior cingulate, visual, parietal, and temporal cortices. Most of these regions displayed responses to probabilities consistent with nonlinear probability weighting. The neural responses to passive lotteries predicted 79% of subsequent decisions when individuals were offered choices between different lotteries, and exceeded that predicted by behavior alone near the indifference point.

AB - While mainstream economic models assume that individuals treat probabilities objectively, many people tend to overestimate the likelihood of improbable events and underestimate the likelihood of probable events. However, a biological account for why probabilities would be treated this way does not yet exist. While undergoing fMRI, we presented individuals with a series of lotteries, defined by the voltage of an impending cutaneous electric shock and the probability with which the shock would be received. During the prospect phase, neural activity that tracked the probability of the expected outcome was observed in a circumscribed network of brain regions that included the anterior cingulate, visual, parietal, and temporal cortices. Most of these regions displayed responses to probabilities consistent with nonlinear probability weighting. The neural responses to passive lotteries predicted 79% of subsequent decisions when individuals were offered choices between different lotteries, and exceeded that predicted by behavior alone near the indifference point.

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 2047

EP - 2057

JO - Neuroimage

JF - Neuroimage

SN - 1053-8119

IS - 4

ER -

Berns G, Capra CM, Chappelow J, Moore S, Noussair CN. Nonlinear neurobiological probability weighting functions for aversive outcomes. Neuroimage. 2008;39(4):2047-2057.