Noot bij College voor de Rechten van de Mens, 20 november 2017, AB 2018/26

Research output: Memorandum/expositionCase noteScientific

Abstract

This case concerned the ban on all religious symbols (including headscarfs) at the Dutch police. According to the CRM, this amounts to indirect discrimination. This differential treatment could not be justified in this specific case.
Original languageDutch
Number of pages7
Project No. ECLI:NL:XX:2017:94
File no.2017-135
Finished20/11/17
ApplicantCollege voor de Rechten van de Mens
Publication statusPublished - 22 Jan 2018
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameAB Rechtspraak Bestuursrecht
PublisherWolters Kluwer
No.4
Volume2018

Cite this

Geldof, T., (2018). Noot bij College voor de Rechten van de Mens, 20 november 2017, AB 2018/26, No. 2017-135, No. ECLI:NL:XX:2017:94 , 7 p., Nov 20, 2017. (AB Rechtspraak Bestuursrecht; Vol. 2018, No. 4).
Geldof, Tjebbe. / Noot bij College voor de Rechten van de Mens, 20 november 2017, AB 2018/26. No. 2017-135, No. ECLI:NL:XX:2017:94 , 2018. 7 p., Nov 20, 2017.
@misc{ea1708d4a284443d9f2f409a43b6dbfc,
title = "Noot bij College voor de Rechten van de Mens, 20 november 2017, AB 2018/26",
abstract = "This case concerned the ban on all religious symbols (including headscarfs) at the Dutch police. According to the CRM, this amounts to indirect discrimination. This differential treatment could not be justified in this specific case.",
author = "Tjebbe Geldof",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "22",
language = "Dutch",
series = "AB Rechtspraak Bestuursrecht",
publisher = "Wolters Kluwer",
number = "4",

}

Geldof, T 2018, 'Noot bij College voor de Rechten van de Mens, 20 november 2017, AB 2018/26', no. 2017-135, No. ECLI:NL:XX:2017:94 , 7 p., Nov 20, 2017. AB Rechtspraak Bestuursrecht, no. 4, vol. 2018.

Noot bij College voor de Rechten van de Mens, 20 november 2017, AB 2018/26. / Geldof, Tjebbe.

No. 2017-135, No. ECLI:NL:XX:2017:94 , 2018. 7 p., Nov 20, 2017. (AB Rechtspraak Bestuursrecht; Vol. 2018, No. 4).

Research output: Memorandum/expositionCase noteScientific

TY - GEN

T1 - Noot bij College voor de Rechten van de Mens, 20 november 2017, AB 2018/26

AU - Geldof, Tjebbe

PY - 2018/1/22

Y1 - 2018/1/22

N2 - This case concerned the ban on all religious symbols (including headscarfs) at the Dutch police. According to the CRM, this amounts to indirect discrimination. This differential treatment could not be justified in this specific case.

AB - This case concerned the ban on all religious symbols (including headscarfs) at the Dutch police. According to the CRM, this amounts to indirect discrimination. This differential treatment could not be justified in this specific case.

M3 - Case note

T3 - AB Rechtspraak Bestuursrecht

ER -

Geldof T. Noot bij College voor de Rechten van de Mens, 20 november 2017, AB 2018/26. No. 2017-135, No. ECLI:NL:XX:2017:94 , 2018. 7 p., Nov 20, 2017. (AB Rechtspraak Bestuursrecht; 4).