Not biting the hand that feeds you: How perverted accountability affects the ethical leadership of Dutch mayors

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Dutch mayors are in the curious position that, by law, they are required to act against any integrity violations by their fellow political executives and municipal councillors. At the same time, they are fully accountable to the local council and increasingly dependent on the political support of those they oversee for remaining in office and for their capacity to govern. Data collected from four focus groups and nine interviews indicate that this dependence has produced a precarious situation of ‘perverted accountability’ in which mayors, because they perceive social and career risks, are more likely to refrain from assertive action against integrity violations than the accountability and ethical leadership literature suggests. Here, it is argued that there is an institutional aspect to such reluctance to be an effective moral leader that goes beyond Dutch mayors simply having weak personalities. The current study finds support for the unfashionable argument that accountability can be bad for democracy. It contributes to the study of ethical leadership by identifying perceived personal and positional risks as real-life impediments to ethical leadership and by drawing attention to the complexities of ethical leadership in the realm of politics.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPublic Integrity
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Jan 2019

Fingerprint

mayor
leadership
responsibility
integrity
political support
personality
career
leader
democracy
Law
politics
interview
Group

Keywords

  • ethical leadership
  • accountability
  • Mayors
  • The Netherlands
  • Political leadership

Cite this

@article{a6699350d74d42058acbaef1cadc7317,
title = "Not biting the hand that feeds you: How perverted accountability affects the ethical leadership of Dutch mayors",
abstract = "Dutch mayors are in the curious position that, by law, they are required to act against any integrity violations by their fellow political executives and municipal councillors. At the same time, they are fully accountable to the local council and increasingly dependent on the political support of those they oversee for remaining in office and for their capacity to govern. Data collected from four focus groups and nine interviews indicate that this dependence has produced a precarious situation of ‘perverted accountability’ in which mayors, because they perceive social and career risks, are more likely to refrain from assertive action against integrity violations than the accountability and ethical leadership literature suggests. Here, it is argued that there is an institutional aspect to such reluctance to be an effective moral leader that goes beyond Dutch mayors simply having weak personalities. The current study finds support for the unfashionable argument that accountability can be bad for democracy. It contributes to the study of ethical leadership by identifying perceived personal and positional risks as real-life impediments to ethical leadership and by drawing attention to the complexities of ethical leadership in the realm of politics.",
keywords = "ethical leadership, accountability, Mayors, The Netherlands, Political leadership",
author = "Niels Karsten",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
language = "English",
journal = "Public Integrity",
issn = "1558-0989",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

}

Not biting the hand that feeds you : How perverted accountability affects the ethical leadership of Dutch mayors. / Karsten, Niels.

In: Public Integrity, 01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Not biting the hand that feeds you

T2 - How perverted accountability affects the ethical leadership of Dutch mayors

AU - Karsten, Niels

PY - 2019/1

Y1 - 2019/1

N2 - Dutch mayors are in the curious position that, by law, they are required to act against any integrity violations by their fellow political executives and municipal councillors. At the same time, they are fully accountable to the local council and increasingly dependent on the political support of those they oversee for remaining in office and for their capacity to govern. Data collected from four focus groups and nine interviews indicate that this dependence has produced a precarious situation of ‘perverted accountability’ in which mayors, because they perceive social and career risks, are more likely to refrain from assertive action against integrity violations than the accountability and ethical leadership literature suggests. Here, it is argued that there is an institutional aspect to such reluctance to be an effective moral leader that goes beyond Dutch mayors simply having weak personalities. The current study finds support for the unfashionable argument that accountability can be bad for democracy. It contributes to the study of ethical leadership by identifying perceived personal and positional risks as real-life impediments to ethical leadership and by drawing attention to the complexities of ethical leadership in the realm of politics.

AB - Dutch mayors are in the curious position that, by law, they are required to act against any integrity violations by their fellow political executives and municipal councillors. At the same time, they are fully accountable to the local council and increasingly dependent on the political support of those they oversee for remaining in office and for their capacity to govern. Data collected from four focus groups and nine interviews indicate that this dependence has produced a precarious situation of ‘perverted accountability’ in which mayors, because they perceive social and career risks, are more likely to refrain from assertive action against integrity violations than the accountability and ethical leadership literature suggests. Here, it is argued that there is an institutional aspect to such reluctance to be an effective moral leader that goes beyond Dutch mayors simply having weak personalities. The current study finds support for the unfashionable argument that accountability can be bad for democracy. It contributes to the study of ethical leadership by identifying perceived personal and positional risks as real-life impediments to ethical leadership and by drawing attention to the complexities of ethical leadership in the realm of politics.

KW - ethical leadership

KW - accountability

KW - Mayors

KW - The Netherlands

KW - Political leadership

M3 - Article

JO - Public Integrity

JF - Public Integrity

SN - 1558-0989

ER -