Abstract
This article discusses the right of access to a court in the most recent case law of the European Court of Human Rights, more particularly the application of the so-called Eskelinen-test in the context of cases concerning domestic Judges. The Court appears to have established a new approach to this test, which considerably raises the bar to exclude Judges from access to a court when disputes about their status or career are concerned. First, the article discusses this new approach, suggesting that the reason for it can be found in the current rule of law landscape in Europe and highlighting its potential for future rule of law related cases. Yet, it equally points out how the test gives the final say in disputes about the status or career of Judges to Judges themselves, which creates potential issues of internal judicial independence, and may skew sensitive systems of balance of powers.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 23-57 |
Number of pages | 35 |
Journal | European Convention on Human Rights Law Review |
Volume | 4 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 10 Mar 2023 |