Abstract
Bruineberg and collaborators distinguish three philosophical positions about the status of Markov blankets in the context of active inference modelling, namely: literalism, realism, and instrumentalism. They criticize the first two positions and suggest that instrumentalism is “less problematic but also less interesting” (sect. 6.1.2, para. 5) Here, I sketch how literalists and realists might reply to Bruineberg et al.'s criticisms, and I explain why instrumentalism is more interesting and contentious than what Bruineberg and collaborators suggest.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e191 |
| Journal | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
| Volume | 45 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 29 Sept 2022 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Nothing but a useful tool? (F)utility and the free-energy principle'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver