Abstract
Objectives:
This article analyzes the efforts of three organizations to provide a standard that guides Internet users to reliable health care sites.
Methods:
Comparison of health Internet sites, interviews and document studies.
Results:
In comparing these approaches, three different constructions of reliability are identified.
Conclusions:
The resulting possibilities and restrictions of these constructions for users that are searching for health information on the Internet are revealed.
This article analyzes the efforts of three organizations to provide a standard that guides Internet users to reliable health care sites.
Methods:
Comparison of health Internet sites, interviews and document studies.
Results:
In comparing these approaches, three different constructions of reliability are identified.
Conclusions:
The resulting possibilities and restrictions of these constructions for users that are searching for health information on the Internet are revealed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 307-312 |
| Journal | Methods of Information in Medicine |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - 2003 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Notions of reliability: Considering the importance of difference in guiding patients to health care Web sites'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver