On critical reflection: A review of Mezirow’s theory and its operationalization

H. Lundgren, R.F. Poell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

In this article, we review empirical studies that research critical reflection based on Mezirow’s definition. The concepts of content, process, and premise reflection have often been cited, and operationalizing Mezirow’s high-level transformative learning theory and its components has been the endeavor of adult education and human resource development (HRD) researchers. By conducting a literature review, we distill 12 research studies on critical reflection that we dissect, analyze, and compare. Discovering different approaches, assessment processes, and outcomes leads us to the conclusion that there is little agreement on how to operationalize reflection. We suggest four improvements: (a) integrating different critical reflection traditions, (b) using multiple data collection pathways, (c) opting for thematic embedding, and (d) attending to feelings. By implementing these improvements, we hope to stimulate closer alignment of approaches in critical reflection research across adult education and HRD researchers.
Keywords: critical reflection, levels of reflection, Mezirow, transformative learning, operationalization, adult education theory, literature review
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-28
JournalHuman Resource Development Review
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Adult Education
operationalization
human resources development
literature theory
learning theory
learning

Cite this

@article{a89ffcf9f2cd418981df73ddc4f30db6,
title = "On critical reflection: A review of Mezirow’s theory and its operationalization",
abstract = "In this article, we review empirical studies that research critical reflection based on Mezirow’s definition. The concepts of content, process, and premise reflection have often been cited, and operationalizing Mezirow’s high-level transformative learning theory and its components has been the endeavor of adult education and human resource development (HRD) researchers. By conducting a literature review, we distill 12 research studies on critical reflection that we dissect, analyze, and compare. Discovering different approaches, assessment processes, and outcomes leads us to the conclusion that there is little agreement on how to operationalize reflection. We suggest four improvements: (a) integrating different critical reflection traditions, (b) using multiple data collection pathways, (c) opting for thematic embedding, and (d) attending to feelings. By implementing these improvements, we hope to stimulate closer alignment of approaches in critical reflection research across adult education and HRD researchers.Keywords: critical reflection, levels of reflection, Mezirow, transformative learning, operationalization, adult education theory, literature review",
author = "H. Lundgren and R.F. Poell",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1177/1534484315622735",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "3--28",
journal = "Human Resource Development Review",
issn = "1534-4843",
number = "1",

}

On critical reflection : A review of Mezirow’s theory and its operationalization. / Lundgren, H.; Poell, R.F.

In: Human Resource Development Review, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2016, p. 3-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - On critical reflection

T2 - A review of Mezirow’s theory and its operationalization

AU - Lundgren, H.

AU - Poell, R.F.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - In this article, we review empirical studies that research critical reflection based on Mezirow’s definition. The concepts of content, process, and premise reflection have often been cited, and operationalizing Mezirow’s high-level transformative learning theory and its components has been the endeavor of adult education and human resource development (HRD) researchers. By conducting a literature review, we distill 12 research studies on critical reflection that we dissect, analyze, and compare. Discovering different approaches, assessment processes, and outcomes leads us to the conclusion that there is little agreement on how to operationalize reflection. We suggest four improvements: (a) integrating different critical reflection traditions, (b) using multiple data collection pathways, (c) opting for thematic embedding, and (d) attending to feelings. By implementing these improvements, we hope to stimulate closer alignment of approaches in critical reflection research across adult education and HRD researchers.Keywords: critical reflection, levels of reflection, Mezirow, transformative learning, operationalization, adult education theory, literature review

AB - In this article, we review empirical studies that research critical reflection based on Mezirow’s definition. The concepts of content, process, and premise reflection have often been cited, and operationalizing Mezirow’s high-level transformative learning theory and its components has been the endeavor of adult education and human resource development (HRD) researchers. By conducting a literature review, we distill 12 research studies on critical reflection that we dissect, analyze, and compare. Discovering different approaches, assessment processes, and outcomes leads us to the conclusion that there is little agreement on how to operationalize reflection. We suggest four improvements: (a) integrating different critical reflection traditions, (b) using multiple data collection pathways, (c) opting for thematic embedding, and (d) attending to feelings. By implementing these improvements, we hope to stimulate closer alignment of approaches in critical reflection research across adult education and HRD researchers.Keywords: critical reflection, levels of reflection, Mezirow, transformative learning, operationalization, adult education theory, literature review

U2 - 10.1177/1534484315622735

DO - 10.1177/1534484315622735

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 3

EP - 28

JO - Human Resource Development Review

JF - Human Resource Development Review

SN - 1534-4843

IS - 1

ER -