On the Intuition of Rank-Dependent Utility

E. Diecidue, P.P. Wakker

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

376 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Among the most popular models for decision under risk and uncertainty are the rank-dependent models, introduced by Quiggin and Schmeidler.Central concepts in these models are rank-dependence and comonotonicity.It has been suggested in the literature that these concepts are technical tools that have no intuitive or empirical content.This paper describes such contents.As a result, rank-dependence and comonotonicity become natural concepts upon which preference conditions, empirical tests, and improvements for utility measurement can be based.Further, a new derivation of the rank-dependent models is obtained.It is not based on observable preference axioms or on empirical data, but naturally follows from the intuitive perspective assumed.We think that the popularity of the rank-dependent theories is mainly due to the natural concepts adopted in these theories.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherMicroeconomics
Number of pages41
Volume2000-74
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Publication series

NameCentER Discussion Paper
Volume2000-74

Fingerprint

Intuition
Rank-dependent utility
Comonotonicity
Rank dependence
Empirical data
Empirical test
Risk and uncertainty
Utility measurement
Axioms
Decision under risk
Decision under uncertainty

Keywords

  • rank-dependence
  • comonotonicity
  • Choquet integral
  • pessimism
  • uncertainty aversion
  • prospect theory

Cite this

Diecidue, E., & Wakker, P. P. (2000). On the Intuition of Rank-Dependent Utility. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2000-74). Tilburg: Microeconomics.
Diecidue, E. ; Wakker, P.P. / On the Intuition of Rank-Dependent Utility. Tilburg : Microeconomics, 2000. (CentER Discussion Paper).
@techreport{f4b5fed106544f7890faf4a007c3a7ca,
title = "On the Intuition of Rank-Dependent Utility",
abstract = "Among the most popular models for decision under risk and uncertainty are the rank-dependent models, introduced by Quiggin and Schmeidler.Central concepts in these models are rank-dependence and comonotonicity.It has been suggested in the literature that these concepts are technical tools that have no intuitive or empirical content.This paper describes such contents.As a result, rank-dependence and comonotonicity become natural concepts upon which preference conditions, empirical tests, and improvements for utility measurement can be based.Further, a new derivation of the rank-dependent models is obtained.It is not based on observable preference axioms or on empirical data, but naturally follows from the intuitive perspective assumed.We think that the popularity of the rank-dependent theories is mainly due to the natural concepts adopted in these theories.",
keywords = "rank-dependence, comonotonicity, Choquet integral, pessimism, uncertainty aversion, prospect theory",
author = "E. Diecidue and P.P. Wakker",
note = "Pagination: 41",
year = "2000",
language = "English",
volume = "2000-74",
series = "CentER Discussion Paper",
publisher = "Microeconomics",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Microeconomics",

}

Diecidue, E & Wakker, PP 2000 'On the Intuition of Rank-Dependent Utility' CentER Discussion Paper, vol. 2000-74, Microeconomics, Tilburg.

On the Intuition of Rank-Dependent Utility. / Diecidue, E.; Wakker, P.P.

Tilburg : Microeconomics, 2000. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2000-74).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - On the Intuition of Rank-Dependent Utility

AU - Diecidue, E.

AU - Wakker, P.P.

N1 - Pagination: 41

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Among the most popular models for decision under risk and uncertainty are the rank-dependent models, introduced by Quiggin and Schmeidler.Central concepts in these models are rank-dependence and comonotonicity.It has been suggested in the literature that these concepts are technical tools that have no intuitive or empirical content.This paper describes such contents.As a result, rank-dependence and comonotonicity become natural concepts upon which preference conditions, empirical tests, and improvements for utility measurement can be based.Further, a new derivation of the rank-dependent models is obtained.It is not based on observable preference axioms or on empirical data, but naturally follows from the intuitive perspective assumed.We think that the popularity of the rank-dependent theories is mainly due to the natural concepts adopted in these theories.

AB - Among the most popular models for decision under risk and uncertainty are the rank-dependent models, introduced by Quiggin and Schmeidler.Central concepts in these models are rank-dependence and comonotonicity.It has been suggested in the literature that these concepts are technical tools that have no intuitive or empirical content.This paper describes such contents.As a result, rank-dependence and comonotonicity become natural concepts upon which preference conditions, empirical tests, and improvements for utility measurement can be based.Further, a new derivation of the rank-dependent models is obtained.It is not based on observable preference axioms or on empirical data, but naturally follows from the intuitive perspective assumed.We think that the popularity of the rank-dependent theories is mainly due to the natural concepts adopted in these theories.

KW - rank-dependence

KW - comonotonicity

KW - Choquet integral

KW - pessimism

KW - uncertainty aversion

KW - prospect theory

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 2000-74

T3 - CentER Discussion Paper

BT - On the Intuition of Rank-Dependent Utility

PB - Microeconomics

CY - Tilburg

ER -

Diecidue E, Wakker PP. On the Intuition of Rank-Dependent Utility. Tilburg: Microeconomics. 2000. (CentER Discussion Paper).