On the possibility of normative contestation of automated data-driven decisions

Emre Bayamlioglu

On the possibility of normative contestation of automated data-driven decisions

Emre Bayamlioglu

TILT

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Scientific › peer-review

101 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This provocation intends to identify the possible requirements of a transparency model which aims to decompose and analyse automated decision-making systems not by the mechanisms of their operation but rather by the normativity embedded in their behaviour/action. For the effective contestation of automated decisions, essential components of a Rule-based Model (RbM) are briefly described as: i) the data as ‘decisional input’, ii) the ‘normativities’ contained by the system both at the inference and decision (rule-making) level, iii) the context and further implications of the decision, iv) the accountable actors

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Being profiled:Cogitas ergo sum
Subtitle of host publication	10 years of profiling the European citizen
Editors	Emre Bayamlıoğlu, Irina Baraluic, Liisa Janssens , Mireille Hildebrandt
Place of Publication	Amsterdam
Publisher	AUP
Pages	30-33
Number of pages	4
ISBN (Electronic)	978 90 4855 018 0
ISBN (Print)	978 94 6372 212 4
Publication status	Published - 18 Dec 2018

Access to Document

SSRN-id3393559Final published version, 66.5 KBLicence: Taverne

Cite this

@inbook{2502d79bdb4142e6b3ac93b1b6355201,

title = "On the possibility of normative contestation of automated data-driven decisions",

abstract = "This provocation intends to identify the possible requirements of a transparency model which aims to decompose and analyse automated decision-making systems not by the mechanisms of their operation but rather by the normativity embedded in their behaviour/action. For the effective contestation of automated decisions, essential components of a Rule-based Model (RbM) are briefly described as: i) the data as {\textquoteleft}decisional input{\textquoteright}, ii) the {\textquoteleft}normativities{\textquoteright} contained by the system both at the inference and decision (rule-making) level, iii) the context and further implications of the decision, iv) the accountable actors",

author = "Emre Bayamlioglu",

year = "2018",

month = dec,

day = "18",

language = "English",

isbn = "978 94 6372 212 4",

pages = "30--33",

editor = "Bayamlıoğlu, \{Emre \} and Baraluic, \{Irina \} and \{Janssens \}, \{Liisa \} and \{Hildebrandt \}, \{Mireille \}",

booktitle = "Being profiled:Cogitas ergo sum",

publisher = "AUP",

}

On the possibility of normative contestation of automated data-driven decisions. / Bayamlioglu, Emre.
Being profiled:Cogitas ergo sum: 10 years of profiling the European citizen. ed. / Emre Bayamlıoğlu; Irina Baraluic; Liisa Janssens ; Mireille Hildebrandt . Amsterdam: AUP, 2018. p. 30-33.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Scientific › peer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - On the possibility of normative contestation of automated data-driven decisions

AU - Bayamlioglu, Emre

PY - 2018/12/18

Y1 - 2018/12/18

N2 - This provocation intends to identify the possible requirements of a transparency model which aims to decompose and analyse automated decision-making systems not by the mechanisms of their operation but rather by the normativity embedded in their behaviour/action. For the effective contestation of automated decisions, essential components of a Rule-based Model (RbM) are briefly described as: i) the data as ‘decisional input’, ii) the ‘normativities’ contained by the system both at the inference and decision (rule-making) level, iii) the context and further implications of the decision, iv) the accountable actors

AB - This provocation intends to identify the possible requirements of a transparency model which aims to decompose and analyse automated decision-making systems not by the mechanisms of their operation but rather by the normativity embedded in their behaviour/action. For the effective contestation of automated decisions, essential components of a Rule-based Model (RbM) are briefly described as: i) the data as ‘decisional input’, ii) the ‘normativities’ contained by the system both at the inference and decision (rule-making) level, iii) the context and further implications of the decision, iv) the accountable actors

UR - https://www.cohubicol.com/publications

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978 94 6372 212 4

SP - 30

EP - 33

BT - Being profiled:Cogitas ergo sum

A2 - Bayamlıoğlu, Emre

A2 - Baraluic, Irina

A2 - Janssens , Liisa

A2 - Hildebrandt , Mireille

PB - AUP

CY - Amsterdam

ER -

On the possibility of normative contestation of automated data-driven decisions

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this