On the Significance of the Identity Debate in DBS and the Need of an Inclusive Research Agenda. A Reply to Gilbert, Viana and Ineichen

Anke Snoek*, Sanneke de Haan, Maartje Schermer, Dorothee Horstkötter

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Gilbert et al. (Neuroethics, 2018) argue that the concerns about the influence of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) on – as they lump together – personality, identity, agency, autonomy, authenticity and the self (PIAAAS) are due to an ethics hype. They argue that there is only a small empirical base for an extended ethics debate. We will critically examine their claims and argue that Gilbert and colleagues do not show that the identity debate in DBS is a bubble, they in fact give very little evidence for that. Rather they show the challenges of doing research in a field that is stretched out over multiple disciplines. In that sense their paper is an important starting point for a discussion on methodology and offers valuable lessons for a future research agenda.
Original languageEnglish
JournalNeuroethics
Publication statusPublished - 26 May 2019

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • AUTONOMY
  • AGENCY
  • Deep brain stimulation
  • IDENTITY
  • Neuroethics
  • SELF
  • Multidisciplinary research
  • Interdisciplinary methodology

Cite this