On the ubiquity of information inconsistency for conjugate priors

Joris Mulder, James O. Berger, Victor Pena, M. J. Bayarri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review


Informally, "Information Inconsistency" is the property that has been observed in many Bayesian hypothesis testing and model selection procedures whereby the Bayesian conclusion does not become definitive when the data seems to become definitive. An example is that, when performing a t-test using standard conjugate priors, the Bayes factor of the alternative hypothesis to the null hypothesis remains bounded as the t statistic grows to infinity. This paper shows that information inconsistency is ubiquitous in Bayesian hypothesis testing under conjugate priors. Yet the title does not fully describe the paper, since we also show that theoretically recommended priors, including scale mixtures of conjugate priors and adaptive priors, are information consistent. Hence the paper is simply a forceful warning that use of conjugate priors in testing and model selection is highly problematical, and should be replaced by the information consistent alternatives.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2021


Dive into the research topics of 'On the ubiquity of information inconsistency for conjugate priors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this