On the Valuation of the Causes and Consequences of Environmental Damages

Evidence from a Field Experiment (revision of CentER DP 2017-029)

Rahel Jigi Kitessa

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

95 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Standard economic theory assumes that agents’ valuation of economic outcomes is independent of the process via which these outcomes are produced. Yet Bulte, Gerking, List, and de Zeeuw (2005) found that causes in addition to outcomes matter in valuation. Using a field experiment I test whether drawing people’s attention to the role they play in the process of environmental degradation affects their willingness to pay for mitigation, and how this compares the activities undertaken by others. I do so by eliciting contributions to a reforestation program in an environmentally valuable area in Ethiopia. I implement three different conditions which allow me to measure the impact on contributions of emphasizing (i) the contributions of others to forest conservation, and (ii) the role of the respondents themselves in the forest degradation process. I find that learning about the efforts of others does not affect contributions while emphasizing the respondents’ negative role in the process actually increases contributions. Extant literature notes that including information on human-caused environmental damage in contingent valuation surveys does indeed increases the WTP values. This was, however, attributed to ‘outrage effect’ – that is, because respondents are upset, they contribute more to environmental goods. In a somewhat different setting this study finds evidence that people’s contributions also increase significantly and substantially if attention is drawn to their own responsibility in the deforestation and desertification process, suggesting, the ‘responsibility effect’ is also important in valuation.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherCentER, Center for Economic Research
Number of pages25
Volume2017-029
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2018

Publication series

NameCentER Discussion Paper
Volume2018-017

Fingerprint

Field experiment
Environmental damage
Willingness-to-pay
Responsibility
Environmental degradation
Reforestation
Contingent valuation
Mitigation
Ethiopia
Economics
Degradation
Deforestation
Economic theory
Forest conservation

Keywords

  • valuation of environment
  • incentive compatible valuation techniques
  • conservation
  • field experiment
  • forestry
  • public goods

Cite this

Kitessa, R. J. (2018). On the Valuation of the Causes and Consequences of Environmental Damages: Evidence from a Field Experiment (revision of CentER DP 2017-029). (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2018-017). Tilburg: CentER, Center for Economic Research.
Kitessa, Rahel Jigi. / On the Valuation of the Causes and Consequences of Environmental Damages : Evidence from a Field Experiment (revision of CentER DP 2017-029). Tilburg : CentER, Center for Economic Research, 2018. (CentER Discussion Paper).
@techreport{3d1f1a62d62a44d38c8a65bad2f0d7a8,
title = "On the Valuation of the Causes and Consequences of Environmental Damages: Evidence from a Field Experiment (revision of CentER DP 2017-029)",
abstract = "Standard economic theory assumes that agents’ valuation of economic outcomes is independent of the process via which these outcomes are produced. Yet Bulte, Gerking, List, and de Zeeuw (2005) found that causes in addition to outcomes matter in valuation. Using a field experiment I test whether drawing people’s attention to the role they play in the process of environmental degradation affects their willingness to pay for mitigation, and how this compares the activities undertaken by others. I do so by eliciting contributions to a reforestation program in an environmentally valuable area in Ethiopia. I implement three different conditions which allow me to measure the impact on contributions of emphasizing (i) the contributions of others to forest conservation, and (ii) the role of the respondents themselves in the forest degradation process. I find that learning about the efforts of others does not affect contributions while emphasizing the respondents’ negative role in the process actually increases contributions. Extant literature notes that including information on human-caused environmental damage in contingent valuation surveys does indeed increases the WTP values. This was, however, attributed to ‘outrage effect’ – that is, because respondents are upset, they contribute more to environmental goods. In a somewhat different setting this study finds evidence that people’s contributions also increase significantly and substantially if attention is drawn to their own responsibility in the deforestation and desertification process, suggesting, the ‘responsibility effect’ is also important in valuation.",
keywords = "valuation of environment, incentive compatible valuation techniques, conservation, field experiment, forestry, public goods",
author = "Kitessa, {Rahel Jigi}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "2017-029",
series = "CentER Discussion Paper",
publisher = "CentER, Center for Economic Research",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "CentER, Center for Economic Research",

}

Kitessa, RJ 2018 'On the Valuation of the Causes and Consequences of Environmental Damages: Evidence from a Field Experiment (revision of CentER DP 2017-029)' CentER Discussion Paper, vol. 2018-017, CentER, Center for Economic Research, Tilburg.

On the Valuation of the Causes and Consequences of Environmental Damages : Evidence from a Field Experiment (revision of CentER DP 2017-029). / Kitessa, Rahel Jigi.

Tilburg : CentER, Center for Economic Research, 2018. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2018-017).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - On the Valuation of the Causes and Consequences of Environmental Damages

T2 - Evidence from a Field Experiment (revision of CentER DP 2017-029)

AU - Kitessa, Rahel Jigi

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Standard economic theory assumes that agents’ valuation of economic outcomes is independent of the process via which these outcomes are produced. Yet Bulte, Gerking, List, and de Zeeuw (2005) found that causes in addition to outcomes matter in valuation. Using a field experiment I test whether drawing people’s attention to the role they play in the process of environmental degradation affects their willingness to pay for mitigation, and how this compares the activities undertaken by others. I do so by eliciting contributions to a reforestation program in an environmentally valuable area in Ethiopia. I implement three different conditions which allow me to measure the impact on contributions of emphasizing (i) the contributions of others to forest conservation, and (ii) the role of the respondents themselves in the forest degradation process. I find that learning about the efforts of others does not affect contributions while emphasizing the respondents’ negative role in the process actually increases contributions. Extant literature notes that including information on human-caused environmental damage in contingent valuation surveys does indeed increases the WTP values. This was, however, attributed to ‘outrage effect’ – that is, because respondents are upset, they contribute more to environmental goods. In a somewhat different setting this study finds evidence that people’s contributions also increase significantly and substantially if attention is drawn to their own responsibility in the deforestation and desertification process, suggesting, the ‘responsibility effect’ is also important in valuation.

AB - Standard economic theory assumes that agents’ valuation of economic outcomes is independent of the process via which these outcomes are produced. Yet Bulte, Gerking, List, and de Zeeuw (2005) found that causes in addition to outcomes matter in valuation. Using a field experiment I test whether drawing people’s attention to the role they play in the process of environmental degradation affects their willingness to pay for mitigation, and how this compares the activities undertaken by others. I do so by eliciting contributions to a reforestation program in an environmentally valuable area in Ethiopia. I implement three different conditions which allow me to measure the impact on contributions of emphasizing (i) the contributions of others to forest conservation, and (ii) the role of the respondents themselves in the forest degradation process. I find that learning about the efforts of others does not affect contributions while emphasizing the respondents’ negative role in the process actually increases contributions. Extant literature notes that including information on human-caused environmental damage in contingent valuation surveys does indeed increases the WTP values. This was, however, attributed to ‘outrage effect’ – that is, because respondents are upset, they contribute more to environmental goods. In a somewhat different setting this study finds evidence that people’s contributions also increase significantly and substantially if attention is drawn to their own responsibility in the deforestation and desertification process, suggesting, the ‘responsibility effect’ is also important in valuation.

KW - valuation of environment

KW - incentive compatible valuation techniques

KW - conservation

KW - field experiment

KW - forestry

KW - public goods

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 2017-029

T3 - CentER Discussion Paper

BT - On the Valuation of the Causes and Consequences of Environmental Damages

PB - CentER, Center for Economic Research

CY - Tilburg

ER -

Kitessa RJ. On the Valuation of the Causes and Consequences of Environmental Damages: Evidence from a Field Experiment (revision of CentER DP 2017-029). Tilburg: CentER, Center for Economic Research. 2018 May 1. (CentER Discussion Paper).