TY - JOUR
T1 - Operationalizing reflection in experience-based workplace learning
T2 - A hybrid approach
AU - Justice, Sean
AU - Bang, April
AU - Lundgren, Henriette
AU - Marsick, Victoria J.
AU - Poell, Rob
AU - Yorks, Lyle
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - This article explores the pragmatics of operationalizing reflection in experience-based workplace learning. It proposes a constructivist-situative framework – not typically considered feasible – based on balancing the complementary strengths of each individual framework. We distinguish among four empirically demonstrated approaches that operationalize reflection using one or the other framework: cognitive process approach; integration of critically reflective work behaviours; use of phenomenological critical incidents to review emotionally laden experiences; and situated exploration of interactions between individuals and tools. Next, we apply these four approaches to previously collected data from medical and managerial workplace learning contexts. Through secondary analysis, we explore the utility of a combined framework, and consider the challenges therein. We argue that operationalizing reflection based on complementarity looks feasible though challenging. We close by discussing the practice of researching reflection through reflection, and speculating on opportunities for future workplace learning research based on emerging redefinitions of workplaces, interventionist methodologies, and conceptualizing learning environments as sociomaterial.
AB - This article explores the pragmatics of operationalizing reflection in experience-based workplace learning. It proposes a constructivist-situative framework – not typically considered feasible – based on balancing the complementary strengths of each individual framework. We distinguish among four empirically demonstrated approaches that operationalize reflection using one or the other framework: cognitive process approach; integration of critically reflective work behaviours; use of phenomenological critical incidents to review emotionally laden experiences; and situated exploration of interactions between individuals and tools. Next, we apply these four approaches to previously collected data from medical and managerial workplace learning contexts. Through secondary analysis, we explore the utility of a combined framework, and consider the challenges therein. We argue that operationalizing reflection based on complementarity looks feasible though challenging. We close by discussing the practice of researching reflection through reflection, and speculating on opportunities for future workplace learning research based on emerging redefinitions of workplaces, interventionist methodologies, and conceptualizing learning environments as sociomaterial.
KW - Experience-based learning
KW - MANAGEMENT
KW - SCHOLARSHIP
KW - WORK
KW - constructivist
KW - operationalization
KW - reflection
KW - situative
UR - https://app-eu.readspeaker.com/cgi-bin/rsent?customerid=10118&lang=en_us&readclass=rs_readArea&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tandfonline.com%2Fdoi%2Ffull%2F10.1080%2F13678868.2019.1621250
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066796278&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13678868.2019.1621250
DO - 10.1080/13678868.2019.1621250
M3 - Article
SN - 1367-8868
VL - 23
SP - 66
EP - 87
JO - Human Resource Development International
JF - Human Resource Development International
IS - 1
ER -