Operationalizing reflection in experience-based workplace learning approach: A hybrid

Sean Justice, April Bang, Henriette Lundgren, Victoria J. Marsick, Rob Poell, Lyle Yorks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This article explores the pragmatics of operationalizing reflection in experience-based workplace learning. It proposes a constructivist-situative framework – not typically considered feasible – based on balancing the complementary strengths of each individual framework. We distinguish among four empirically demonstrated approaches that operationalize reflection using one or the other framework: cognitive process approach; integration of critically reflective work behaviours; use of phenomenological critical incidents to review emotionally laden experiences; and situated exploration of interactions between individuals and tools. Next, we apply these four approaches to previously collected data from medical and managerial workplace learning contexts. Through secondary analysis, we explore the utility of a combined framework, and consider the challenges therein. We argue that operationalizing reflection based on complementarity looks feasible though challenging. We close by discussing the practice of researching reflection through reflection, and speculating on opportunities for future workplace learning research based on emerging redefinitions of workplaces, interventionist methodologies, and conceptualizing learning environments as sociomaterial.
Original languageEnglish
JournalHuman Resource Development International
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2019

Fingerprint

Workplace learning
Learning environment
Cognitive processes
Methodology
Work behavior
Process approach
Complementarity
Critical incidents
Work place
Interaction

Cite this

@article{cbbfad62d44b4e4384346d700738b3f9,
title = "Operationalizing reflection in experience-based workplace learning approach: A hybrid",
abstract = "This article explores the pragmatics of operationalizing reflection in experience-based workplace learning. It proposes a constructivist-situative framework – not typically considered feasible – based on balancing the complementary strengths of each individual framework. We distinguish among four empirically demonstrated approaches that operationalize reflection using one or the other framework: cognitive process approach; integration of critically reflective work behaviours; use of phenomenological critical incidents to review emotionally laden experiences; and situated exploration of interactions between individuals and tools. Next, we apply these four approaches to previously collected data from medical and managerial workplace learning contexts. Through secondary analysis, we explore the utility of a combined framework, and consider the challenges therein. We argue that operationalizing reflection based on complementarity looks feasible though challenging. We close by discussing the practice of researching reflection through reflection, and speculating on opportunities for future workplace learning research based on emerging redefinitions of workplaces, interventionist methodologies, and conceptualizing learning environments as sociomaterial.",
author = "Sean Justice and April Bang and Henriette Lundgren and Marsick, {Victoria J.} and Rob Poell and Lyle Yorks",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/13678868.2019.1621250",
language = "English",
journal = "Human Resource Development International",
issn = "1367-8868",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

}

Operationalizing reflection in experience-based workplace learning approach : A hybrid. / Justice, Sean; Bang, April; Lundgren, Henriette; Marsick, Victoria J.; Poell, Rob; Yorks, Lyle.

In: Human Resource Development International, 2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Operationalizing reflection in experience-based workplace learning approach

T2 - A hybrid

AU - Justice, Sean

AU - Bang, April

AU - Lundgren, Henriette

AU - Marsick, Victoria J.

AU - Poell, Rob

AU - Yorks, Lyle

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - This article explores the pragmatics of operationalizing reflection in experience-based workplace learning. It proposes a constructivist-situative framework – not typically considered feasible – based on balancing the complementary strengths of each individual framework. We distinguish among four empirically demonstrated approaches that operationalize reflection using one or the other framework: cognitive process approach; integration of critically reflective work behaviours; use of phenomenological critical incidents to review emotionally laden experiences; and situated exploration of interactions between individuals and tools. Next, we apply these four approaches to previously collected data from medical and managerial workplace learning contexts. Through secondary analysis, we explore the utility of a combined framework, and consider the challenges therein. We argue that operationalizing reflection based on complementarity looks feasible though challenging. We close by discussing the practice of researching reflection through reflection, and speculating on opportunities for future workplace learning research based on emerging redefinitions of workplaces, interventionist methodologies, and conceptualizing learning environments as sociomaterial.

AB - This article explores the pragmatics of operationalizing reflection in experience-based workplace learning. It proposes a constructivist-situative framework – not typically considered feasible – based on balancing the complementary strengths of each individual framework. We distinguish among four empirically demonstrated approaches that operationalize reflection using one or the other framework: cognitive process approach; integration of critically reflective work behaviours; use of phenomenological critical incidents to review emotionally laden experiences; and situated exploration of interactions between individuals and tools. Next, we apply these four approaches to previously collected data from medical and managerial workplace learning contexts. Through secondary analysis, we explore the utility of a combined framework, and consider the challenges therein. We argue that operationalizing reflection based on complementarity looks feasible though challenging. We close by discussing the practice of researching reflection through reflection, and speculating on opportunities for future workplace learning research based on emerging redefinitions of workplaces, interventionist methodologies, and conceptualizing learning environments as sociomaterial.

UR - https://app-eu.readspeaker.com/cgi-bin/rsent?customerid=10118&lang=en_us&readclass=rs_readArea&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tandfonline.com%2Fdoi%2Ffull%2F10.1080%2F13678868.2019.1621250

U2 - 10.1080/13678868.2019.1621250

DO - 10.1080/13678868.2019.1621250

M3 - Article

JO - Human Resource Development International

JF - Human Resource Development International

SN - 1367-8868

ER -